Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20851629›Full record

Trial reportJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2012

Assessment of long-term outcomes for the STRokE DOC telemedicine trial.

Brett C Meyer, Rema Raman, Karin Ernstrom, Gilda M Tafreshi, Branko Huisa, Andrew B Stemer, Thomas M Hemmen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00936455 (An Observational Study to Evaluate the Long Term Outcomes of Patients Previously Enrolled in the STRokE DOC), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00936455 completednot on this map

An Observational Study to Evaluate the Long Term Outcomes of Patients Previously Enrolled in the STRokE DOC ("STRokE DOC Trial (NCT00283868)") Telemedicine Clinical Trial.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2009 to 2010Enrolled75ConditionsTelemedicine Evaluation vs Telephone Evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Holo-Stroke-ii: Stroke care through stroke hologram teleportation- inpatient immersion.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Imaging of prehospital stroke therapeutics.Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2015
    Review
  12. Pooled assessment of computed tomography interpretation by vascular neurologists in the STRokE DOC telestroke network.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brett C MeyerDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA 92103-8466, USA. bcmeyer@ucsd.edu
Rema Raman
Karin Ernstrom
Gilda M Tafreshi
Branko Huisa
Andrew B Stemer
Thomas M Hemmen

Funding

UltrasoundP50NS044148 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEYER, BRETT C · 2003 to 2012
$15.1M
NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS044148NINDS NIH HHS P50NS044148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine can provide stroke evaluations in locations with limited available expertise. The reliability of telestroke has been established. Decision making efficacy has been shown in the National Institutes of Health's STRokE DOC trial. No prospective trial has assessed long-term telestroke outcomes, however. In an institutional review board-approved trial (NCT00936455), we contacted patients originally enrolled in the STRokE DOC trial. A telephone script was used to verify consent. Patients were asked standardized questions regarding disposition, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, mortality, and recurrent stroke for 2 retrospective time points (6 and 12 months postevent) and one current time point. Blind was maintained. Primary outcome measures of mortality and percent mRS score of 0-1 [%mRS(0-1)] at 6 months are reported. Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher's exact was used for categorical variables. Of the original 222 participants, 75 patients or surrogates could be contacted. Mean time from enrollment was 3.96 ± 1.0 years (range, 2.33-5.45 years). Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 8 ± 7 (5 ± 8 for telephone; 12 ± 8 for telemedicine; P = .002). The rate of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) use was 31%. Six-month %mRS(0-1) outcome was not different, at 42%. Mortality after imputation to the entire study sample also was not different, at 18%. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent stroke (P = .61). Some 85% of patients were home at 6 months. This study reports a good 6-month outcome for stroke patients evaluated by telemedicine or telephone. This design is limited by the time since original enrollment and resultant inability to contact participants. Although these findings can add to the limited data on telemedicine outcomes, a prospective trial is needed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodStrokeTelemedicineTimeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20851629
PMCPMC3017214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.