Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20851265›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

Collaborative depression care: history, evolution and ways to enhance dissemination and sustainability.

Wayne Katon, Jürgen Unützer, Kenneth Wells, Loretta Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 295 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wayne KatonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. wkaton@u.washington.edu
Jürgen Unützer
Kenneth Wells
Loretta Jones
University of Washington · USCharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science · USNeurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

Population-Based Psychiatric Intervention--Primary CareK24MH069471 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KATON, WAYNE J · 2004 to 2011
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH069471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the history and evolution of the collaborative depression care model and new research aimed at enhancing dissemination.

methodFour keynote speakers from the 2009 NIMH Annual Mental Health Services Meeting collaborated in this article in order to describe the history and evolution of collaborative depression care, adaptation of collaborative care to new populations and medical settings, and optimal ways to enhance dissemination of this model.

resultsExtensive evidence across 37 randomized trials has shown the effectiveness of collaborative care vs. usual primary care in enhancing quality of depression care and in improving depressive outcomes for up to 2 to 5 years. Collaborative care is currently being disseminated in large health care organizations such as the Veterans Administration and Kaiser Permanente, as well as in fee-for-services systems and federally funded clinic systems of care in multiple states. New adaptations of collaborative care are being tested in pediatric and ob-gyn populations as well as in populations of patients with multiple comorbid medical illnesses. New NIMH-funded research is also testing community-based participatory research approaches to collaborative care to attempt to decrease disparities of care in underserved minority populations.

conclusionCollaborative depression care has extensive research supporting the effectiveness of this model. New research and demonstration projects have focused on adapting this model to new populations and medical settings and on studying ways to optimally disseminate this approach to care, including developing financial models to incentivize dissemination and partnerships with community populations to enhance sustainability and to decrease disparities in quality of mental health care.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDiffusion of InnovationInterdisciplinary CommunicationBiomedical ResearchDepressive DisorderEvidence-Based MedicineForecastingHealthcare DisparitiesHumansPatient Care TeamProgram EvaluationQuality Assurance, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Support as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20851265
PMCPMC3810032
OpenAlexW2092494552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.