ArticleNeuroscience letters2010
Increased delivery of TAT across an endothelial monolayer following ischemic injury.
Article in Neuroscience letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Destruction of vasculogenic mimicry channels by targeting epirubicin plus celecoxib liposomes in treatment of brain glioma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2016Article
- Cell-Permeable Peptide Targeting the Nrf2-Keap1 Interaction: A Potential Novel Therapy for Global Cerebral Ischemia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Transferrin and cell-penetrating peptide dual-functioned liposome for targeted drug delivery to glioma.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- A Multiscale Approach to Blast Neurotrauma Modeling: Part II: Methodology for Inducing Blast Injury to in vitro Models.Frontiers in neurology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is a great need for the development of vehicles capable of delivering therapeutic cargoes across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and into brain cells. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), such as TAT, present one such solution, and have been used successfully in vivo to deliver neuroprotective cargoes to the brain in models of stroke and seizure. However, a significant discrepancy exists in the literature, as other groups have not had the same success. One commonality between the successful studies is a compromised BBB. In this study, we hypothesized that ischemic injury increases the transport of TAT across an endothelial monolayer (comprised of bEnd.3 cells) in vitro and, consequently, increases TAT-mediated delivery into astrocytes on the other side. In the 24h following in vitro ischemia (oxygen-glucose deprivation), transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) significantly decreased, indicating disruption of BBB integrity. Concomitantly, the transport of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-TAT fusion protein significantly increased, and the transduction of GFP-TAT into astrocytes cultured on the other side of the endothelial monolayer significantly increased. These results explain why TAT-mediated delivery of therapeutic cargoes is successful in the ischemic brain but not in the uninjured brain with an intact BBB, highlighting the necessity for continued development of delivery vehicles. We conclude that although TAT may not be an efficient vehicle for trans-BBB delivery across an intact BBB, it may have utility in clinical situations when the BBB is disrupted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.