Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20850008›Full record

ReviewCell2010

Natural killer cell education and tolerance.

Mark T Orr, Lewis L Lanier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 420 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark T OrrDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology and the Cancer Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Lewis L Lanier
Cancer Research Institute · US

Funding

NK MemoryR01AI068129 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LANIER, LEWIS LEE · 2006 to 2020
$6.0M
NK and T Cell Costimulation by NKG2D/DAP10R37AI066897 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LANIER, LEWIS LEE · 2006 to 2015
$3.8M
RAE-1 Family of Proteins in Innate and Adaptive ImmunityR01CA095137 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LANIER, LEWIS LEE · 2003 to 2013
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA095137NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095137NIAID NIH HHS AI066897NIAID NIH HHS AI068129NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI068129NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI066897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells play a key role in the immune response to certain infections and malignancies by direct cytolysis of infected or transformed cells and by secretion of potent immune mediators. NK cells express an array of activating receptors that recognize self-molecules. If not restrained by inhibitory receptors recognizing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I proteins on the surface of self cells, NK cells are able to kill normal, healthy cells. Not all NK cells express inhibitory receptors for self-MHC class I; thus, other tolerance mechanisms are necessary to prevent NK cell-mediated autoimmunity. Here we review the major mechanisms of NK cell education and tolerance.

Indexed as

Immune ToleranceAnimalsAutoantigensHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansKiller Cells, NaturalReceptors, Natural Killer CellAutoantigensHistocompatibility Antigens Class IReceptors, Natural Killer Cell

Identifiers

PMID20850008
PMCPMC2945212
OpenAlexW1964265426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.