Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20849846›Full record

ReviewExperimental eye research2011

A biomechanical paradigm for axonal insult within the optic nerve head in aging and glaucoma.

Claude F Burgoyne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental eye research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 225 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
225citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

225 citing papers in PubMed, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluation of anterior segment and lamina cribrosa parameters in primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and healthy controls.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

165 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claude F BurgoyneOptic Nerve Head Research Laboratory, Part of the Discoveries in Sight Research Laboratories of the Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health System, 1225 NE 2nd Ave, Portland, OR 97232, USA. cfburgoyne@deverseye.org
Legacy Health · US

Funding

IOP RELATED FORCE AND FAILURE IN THE OPTIC NERVE HEADR01EY011610 · NEI · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI BURGOYNE, CLAUDE F · 1998 to 2020
$12.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011610NEI NIH HHS R01EY011610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is dedicated to Rosario Hernandez for her warm support of my own work and her genuine enthusiasm for the work of her colleagues throughout her career. I first met Rosario as a research fellow in Harry Quigley's laboratory between 1991 and 1993. Along with Harry, John Morrison, Elaine Johnson, Abe Clark, Colm O'Brien and many others, Rosario's work has provided lamina cribrosa astrocyte cellular mechanisms that are biomechanically plausible and in so doing provided credibility to early notions of the optic nerve head (ONH) as a biomechanical structure. We owe a large intellectual debt to Rosario for her dogged persistence in the characterization of the ONH astrocyte and lamina cribrosacyte in age and disease. Two questions run through her work and remain of central importance today. First, how do astrocytes respond to and alter the biomechanical environment of the ONH and the physiologic stresses created therein? Second, how do these physiologic demands on the astrocyte influence their ability to deliver the support to retinal ganglion cell axon transport and flow against the translaminar pressure gradient? The purpose of this article is to summarize what is known about the biomechanical determinants of retinal ganglion cell axon physiology within the ONH in the optic neuropathy of aging and Glaucoma. My goal is to provide a biomechanical framework for this discussion. This framework assumes that the ONH astrocytes and glia fundamentally support and influence both the lamina cribrosa extracellular matrix and retinal ganglion cell axon physiology. Rosario Hernandez was one of the first investigators to recognize the implications of this unique circumstance. Many of the ideas contained herein have been initially presented within or derived from her work (Hernandez, M.R., 2000. The optic nerve head in glaucoma: role of astrocytes in tissue remodeling. Prog Retin Eye Res. 19, 297-321.; Hernandez, M.R., Pena, J.D., 1997. The optic nerve head in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 115, 389-395.).

Indexed as

AgingAstrocytesAxonal TransportAxonsGlaucomaHumansOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID20849846
PMCPMC3128181
OpenAlexW1521448031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.