Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20849652›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2010

Older hip fracture patients: three groups with different needs.

Anette H Ranhoff, Kristin Holvik, Mette I Martinsen, Kirsti Domaas, Ludvig F Solheim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Surgical consent by healthcare proxies does not delay surgery in older adult patients with hip fracture.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Does a bicycle accident as the cause of proximal femur fracture indicate that geriatric co-management is superfluous? A retrospective cohort study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  8. A bibliometric analysis of orthogeriatric care: top 50 articles.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Translation, Reliability and Validity of the Spanish Version of the Modified New Mobility Score (NMS-ES).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complications after hip fracture surgery: are they preventable?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anette H RanhoffDepartment of Medicine, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PB 23 Vinderen, 0319 Oslo, Norway. ahranhoff@yahoo.no
Kristin Holvik
Mette I Martinsen
Kirsti Domaas
Ludvig F Solheim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNorway, and particularly Oslo, has the highest reported incidence of hip fractures in the world. It is increasingly common to care for older hip fracture patients in orthogeriatric units where orthopaedic care is combined with interdisciplinary geriatric care. The characteristics and needs of older hip fracture patients are poorly described. The aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of these patients in order to better understand their need for care and rehabilitation.

methodsThis is an observational study based on a quality register for all patients 65+ years in an orthogeriatric unit who are operated for a hip fracture. The unit covers 250,000 inhabitants in Oslo. Patient data were collected in the aim of quality control. The quality database includes demographic, medical, and functional data collected from routine assessment by the interdisciplinary team.

resultsFrom January 2007 to September 2009, 1010 patients, included 241 (24%) from long-term care institutions, were enrolled in the database. Mean age was 85.1 years (SD 7.1), 76% were female, and 83% had experienced an indoor fall. Chronic diseases were registered in 88%, and 38% of the community-dwelling patients had pre-fracture cognitive impairment defined as IQCODE-SF > 3.6. Complications were observed in 51% of the patients, of which the most common were a need for blood transfusion, delirium, and urinary tract infections. Post-operative orthopaedic infections were rare (3.1%). Patients from long-term care were older, (87 vs. 84 years, p < 0.001), more had American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score >/= 3 (67% vs. 48%, p < 0.001) and a higher number of chronic medical conditions (mean 2.2 vs. 1.6, p < 0.001). Among community-dwelling patients, those who had fallen indoors were older, more often female, had ASA score >/= 3, chronic medical conditions, impairment in pre-fracture ADL and cognitive function, and more complications during hospital stay.

conclusionsOlder hip fracture patients in this orthogeriatric unit may be divided into three groups; patients who are relatively fit and have experienced outdoors falls (17%), frail community-dwelling patients who have fallen indoors (59%), and patients from long-term care institutions (24%). Different caring pathways are needed for these groups.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsFrail ElderlyHealth Services Needs and DemandAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHip FracturesHomes for the AgedHumansLong-Term CareMaleResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID20849652
PMCPMC2955032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.