Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20848093›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2011

Quantification of recurrence volumes after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm as surrogate endpoint for treatment stability.

Thorsten Ries, Karl Wegscheider, Asmus Wulff, Kristin Radelfahr, Dennis Säring, Nils Daniel Forkert, Jens Fiehler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Point-TAR: a useful index to follow-up coiled intracranial aneurysms?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thorsten RiesDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. ries@uke.de
Karl Wegscheider
Asmus Wulff
Kristin Radelfahr
Dennis Säring
Nils Daniel Forkert
Jens Fiehler
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNew coils with unproven clinical benefit enlarge the armamentarium for endovascular aneurysm treatment continuously. Large patient numbers needed to detect benefits of such new techniques prevent timely evaluation of efficacy. We propose measuring the volume of aneurysm recurrences as surrogate endpoint for coil stability. We hypothesize that this method allows detecting effects of new materials with reduced sample sizes in comparison to conventional studies with dichotomous endpoints.

methodsInstitutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifty-nine patients with decreasing aneurysm size and at least two available follow-up time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiographies (ToF-MRAs) were included. Newly developed software for measuring aneurysm volume differences based on ToF-MRA images was used. Based on the observed recurrence volumes and retreatment rates, the sample size for future studies comparing standard versus "new coils" were calculated.

resultsMean recurrence volume was 38.92 μl (SD110.85 μl). To show a 50% reduction of retreatment rate to control (p = 0.05; power 80%) in a regular study (dichotomous endpoint), the required sample size would be n = 356 compared with n = 78 if using the continuous surrogate endpoint "recurrence volume". When extrapolating our data to data given in the literature, sample sizes could be reduced from n = 948 to n = 74 without loss of statistical power.

conclusionFurther studies on new materials using volumetric analysis based on ToF-MRA as surrogate endpoint could substantially decrease sample size and allow a more timely assessment of possible benefit of new materials with a fraction of the cost.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersEndovascular ProceduresEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsSecondary PreventionSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20848093
OpenAlexW2056013399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.