ReviewEMBO reports2010
Sustainable digital infrastructure. Although databases and other online resources have become a central tool for biological research, their long-term support and maintenance is far from secure.
Review in EMBO reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- RUM/FILH: a standardized operational capability model for biodiversity databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Unified and pluralistic ideals for data sharing and reuse in biodiversity.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- Crowdsourcing biocuration: The Community Assessment of Community Annotation with Ontologies (CACAO).PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- How to build an effective research network: lessons from two decades of the GARNet plant science community.Journal of experimental botany · 2020Article
- Ewé: a web-based ethnobotanical database for storing and analysing data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- The Future of Digital Sequence Information for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Funding knowledgebases: Towards a sustainable funding model for the UniProt use case.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Data Sharing: Convert Challenges into Opportunities.Frontiers in public health · 2017Review
- Sustainable funding for biocuration: The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) as a case study of a subscription-based funding model.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- From data repositories to submission portals: rethinking the role of domain-specific databases in CollecTF.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Defining the robust behaviour of the plant clock gene circuit with absolute RNA timeseries and open infrastructure.Open biology · 2015Article
- A crystallographic perspective on sharing data and knowledge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2014Article
- What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology.Big data & society · 2014Article
- Making open data work for plant scientists.Journal of experimental botany · 2013Article
- ImageJS: Personalized, participated, pervasive, and reproducible image bioinformatics in the web browser.Journal of pathology informatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.