ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2010
Nucleotide extension genotyping by high-resolution melting.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One limitation of small amplicon melting is the inability to genotype certain nearest-neighbor symmetric variations without manipulating the sample. We have developed a method for these exceptions: a high-resolution melting single nucleotide extension assay. Single nucleotide extension was performed in a new instrument, the LightScanner 32 (LS32), which uses capillary reaction tubes and is capable of real-time PCR and sequential high-resolution melting of 32 samples. Asymmetric PCR used Platinum Taq and LC Green Plus in the master mix for target amplification. Dideoxynucleotides and extension oligonucleotides were sequestered in the tube cap and added post-PCR, maintaining a closed system. One dideoxynucleotides was used per capillary tube. Samples were cycled five times to incorporate dideoxynucleotides into the extension products using ThermoSequenase, followed by high-resolution melting. Single nucleotide polymorphisms from the RET proto-oncogene (n = 7), hemochromatosis (HFE, n = 30), coagulation factor 2 (F2, n = 29), coagulation factor 5 (F5, n = 30), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR, n = 60) genes were genotyped. The DNA melting profiles identified the target single nucleotide polymorphisms by the lowest melting temperature transition. All genotypes had a distinctive melting pattern. The method was 100% concordant with samples previously genotyped at HFE, MTHFR, and F2 and 90% concordant with F5. F5 discordants were genotyped correctly by redesigning the assay. Our results demonstrate that although single nucleotide polymorphisms can be successfully differentiated using this methodology, the method requires careful optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.