ArticleJournal of health communication2010
Media messages about cancer: what do people understand?
Article in Journal of health communication, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persuasive Interventions for Controversial Cancer Screening Recommendations: Testing a Novel Approach to Help Patients Make Evidence-Based Decisions.Annals of family medicine · 2017Trial
- Understanding of Key Obstetric Quality Terminology by Asian and Pacific Islander Subgroups: Implications for Patient Engagement and Health Equity.Maternal and child health journal · 2018Article
- Patient-rated importance of key information on screening colonoscopy in Germany: a survey of statutory health insurance members.BMJ open · 2018Article
- The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: an experimental study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- Determinants of Cancer Early Detection Behaviors:Application of Protection Motivation Theory.Health promotion perspectives · 2015Article
- ColonCancerCheck primary care invitation pilot project: patient perceptions.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013Article
- The Cancer Message Literacy Tests: psychometric analyses and validity studies.Patient education and counseling · 2012Article
- Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension.Patient education and counseling · 2012Article
- Assessing awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms: measure development and results from a population survey in the UK.BMC cancer · 2011Article
- Patient activation and advocacy: which literacy skills matter most?Journal of health communication · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Health messages on television and other mass media have the potential to significantly influence the public's health-related knowledge and behaviors, but little is known about people's ability to comprehend such messages. To investigate whether people understood the spoken information in media messages about cancer prevention and screening, we recruited 44 adults from 3 sites to view 6 messages aired on television and the internet. Participants were asked to paraphrase main points and selected phrases. Qualitative analysis methods were used to identify what content was correctly and accurately recalled and paraphrased, and to describe misunderstandings and misconceptions. While most participants accurately recalled and paraphrased the gist of the messages used here, overgeneralization (e.g., believing preventative behaviors to be more protective than stated), loss of details (e.g., misremembering the recommended age for screening), and confusion or misunderstandings around specific concepts (e.g., interpreting "early stage" as the stage in one's life rather than cancer stage) were common. Variability in the public's ability to understand spoken media messages may limit the effectiveness of both pubic health campaigns and provider-patient communication. Additional research is needed to identify message characteristics that enhance understandability and improve comprehension of spoken media messages about cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.