Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20844913›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2011

Efficacy of fosfomycin and its combination with linezolid, vancomycin and imipenem in an experimental peritonitis model caused by a Staphylococcus aureus strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

M E Pachón-Ibáñez, S Ribes, M A Domínguez, R Fernández, F Tubau, J Ariza, F Gudiol, C Cabellos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic synergy againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Antimicrobial Treatment ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of linezolid combination therapy for serious infections: review of the current evidence.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Fosfomycin.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis in vitro and in vivo with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to fosfomycin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A positive interaction between inhibitors of protein synthesis and cefepime in the fight against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M E Pachón-IbáñezInfectious Diseases Department, IDIBELL-Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. meniapi@hotmail.com
S Ribes
M A Domínguez
R Fernández
F Tubau
J Ariza
F Gudiol
C Cabellos
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of therapies including fosfomycin against clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (hGISA). Time-kill curves were performed over 24 h. Peritonitis in C57BL/6 mice was induced by intraperitoneal inoculation of 10(8) CFU/ml. Four hours later (0 h), therapy was started and the treatment groups were: control (not treated), fosfomycin (100 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), fosfomycin plus linezolid, fosfomycin plus vancomycin and fosfomycin plus imipenem, receiving subcutaneous therapy over 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. In vitro, fosfomycin showed a synergistic effect when combined with the other antimicrobials tested. In the animal model, fosfomycin combinations were effective and significantly reduced the bacteraemia rates achieved in the control, imipenem and vancomycin groups (p < 0.05). The best combination in vivo was fosfomycin plus imipenem. Also, fosfomycin plus linezolid was significantly better than vancomycin alone, reducing the bacterial concentration in the peritoneal fluid. In conclusion, in vitro and in vivo, fosfomycin in combination with linezolid, vancomycin or imipenem exerted a good activity. Fosfomycin plus imipenem was the most active combination, decreasing 3 log CFU/ml, and appears to be a promising combination for clinical practice.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAscitic FluidBacteremiaBacterial LoadDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFosfomycinHumansImipenemLinezolidMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinImipenemLinezolidOxazolidinonesVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID20844913
OpenAlexW2094164655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.