Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20844768›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Lactic acidosis triggers starvation response with paradoxical induction of TXNIP through MondoA.

Julia Ling-Yu Chen, Daniel Merl, Christopher W Peterson, Jianli Wu, Patrick Yantyng Liu, Hanwei Yin, Deborah M Muoio, Don E Ayer, Mike West, Jen-Tsan Chi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein in Cancer and Diabetes.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Ling-Yu ChenInstitute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Daniel Merl
Christopher W Peterson
Jianli Wu
Patrick Yantyng Liu
Hanwei Yin
Deborah M Muoio
Don E Ayer
Mike West
Jen-Tsan Chi
Duke University · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USNational Yang Ming University Hospital · TWUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Integration of Oncogenic Networks in Cancer PhenotypesU54CA112952 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NEVINS, JOSEPH R · 2004 to 2009
$12.4M
Nutrient Sensing and Growth ControlR01GM055668 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AYER, DONALD E · 1997 to 2015
$4.3M
Gene expression programs of lactic acidosis in human cancersR01CA125618 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHI, JEN-TSAN ASHLEY · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125618NCI NIH HHS R01CA125618NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112952NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although lactic acidosis is a prominent feature of solid tumors, we still have limited understanding of the mechanisms by which lactic acidosis influences metabolic phenotypes of cancer cells. We compared global transcriptional responses of breast cancer cells in response to three distinct tumor microenvironmental stresses: lactic acidosis, glucose deprivation, and hypoxia. We found that lactic acidosis and glucose deprivation trigger highly similar transcriptional responses, each inducing features of starvation response. In contrast to their comparable effects on gene expression, lactic acidosis and glucose deprivation have opposing effects on glucose uptake. This divergence of metabolic responses in the context of highly similar transcriptional responses allows the identification of a small subset of genes that are regulated in opposite directions by these two conditions. Among these selected genes, TXNIP and its paralogue ARRDC4 are both induced under lactic acidosis and repressed with glucose deprivation. This induction of TXNIP under lactic acidosis is caused by the activation of the glucose-sensing helix-loop-helix transcriptional complex MondoA:Mlx, which is usually triggered upon glucose exposure. Therefore, the upregulation of TXNIP significantly contributes to inhibition of tumor glycolytic phenotypes under lactic acidosis. Expression levels of TXNIP and ARRDC4 in human cancers are also highly correlated with predicted lactic acidosis pathway activities and associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Lactic acidosis triggers features of starvation response while activating the glucose-sensing MondoA-TXNIP pathways and contributing to the "anti-Warburg" metabolic effects and anti-tumor properties of cancer cells. These results stem from integrative analysis of transcriptome and metabolic response data under various tumor microenvironmental stresses and open new paths to explore how these stresses influence phenotypic and metabolic adaptations in human cancers.

Indexed as

Acidosis, LacticAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorGlucoseHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMiceThioredoxinsTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCarrier ProteinsGlucoseMLXIP protein, humanMLX protein, humanMondoA protein, mouseThioredoxinsTXNIP protein, humanTxnip protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID20844768
PMCPMC2937306
OpenAlexW2100840394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.