Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20844558›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

The origin of eukaryotes and their relationship with the Archaea: are we at a phylogenomic impasse?

Simonetta Gribaldo, Anthony M Poole, Vincent Daubin, Patrick Forterre, Céline Brochier-Armanet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The tree of life of polyamine oxidases.Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Descent of Bacteria and Eukarya From an Archaeal Root of Life.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution.Journal of theoretical biology · 2017
    Article
  16. Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Function and origin of mistranslation in distinct cellular contexts.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simonetta GribaldoInstitut Pasteur, Department of Microbiology, Paris, France. simonetta.gribaldo@pasteur.fr
Anthony M Poole
Vincent Daubin
Patrick Forterre
Céline Brochier-Armanet

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of eukaryotes and their evolutionary relationship with the Archaea is a major biological question and the subject of intense debate. In the context of the classical view of the universal tree of life, the Archaea and the Eukarya have a common ancestor, the nature of which remains undetermined. Alternative views propose instead that the Eukarya evolved directly from a bona fide archaeal lineage. Several recent large-scale phylogenomic studies using an array of approaches are divided in supporting either one or the other scenario, despite analysing largely overlapping data sets of universal genes. We examine the reasons for such a lack of consensus and consider how alternative approaches may enable progress in answering this fascinating and as-yet-unresolved question.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionArchaeaBacteriaClassificationEukaryotaGenome

Identifiers

PMID20844558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.