ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2010
Treating uncomplicated malaria in children: comparing artemisinin-based combination therapies.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn response to increased resistance to conventional drugs, the WHO is promoting artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for treating uncomplicated malaria. The objective of this report is to review the available evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness, acceptability, and deployment of ACT in resource-limited settings with a focus on sub-Saharan Africa. RECENT
findingsACTs are very effective in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children. ACTs are relatively safe and tolerable with no reported resistance in sub-Saharan Africa despite indications of delayed clearance of infections in south-east Asia. The major challenges to the widespread use of ACT include its high cost, availability, and inefficient delivery due to, among other things, weak healthcare systems. SUMMARY: ACTs are an essential tool in the fight to control and eliminate malaria. They are currently the most effective drugs against P. falciparum malaria. They should be deployed through programs that address availability, cost, adherence, and quality assurance. Initiatives including home-based management of malaria, improving public sector procurement and supply chains, and reducing private sector pricing should make ACTs more accessible for sub-Saharan African children who bear the brunt of the burden of malarial disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.