ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010
Evaluation of three influenza A and B real-time reverse transcription-PCR assays and a new 2009 H1N1 assay for detection of influenza viruses.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplex PCR system for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- Impact of Sample Storage Time and Temperature on the Stability of Respiratory Viruses and Enteric Viruses in Wastewater.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) tool for modelling pathogen infection risk to wastewater treatment plant workers.Water research · 2024Article
- CRISPR-Based Assays for Point-of-Need Detection and Subtyping of Influenza.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2024Article
- Aetiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia and the Role of Genetic Host Factors in Hospitalized Patients in Cyprus.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetic Study and Metabolite Identification of CAM106 in Rats by Validated UHPLC-MS/MS.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Wearable bioelectronic masks for wireless detection of respiratory infectious diseases by gaseous media.Matter · 2022Article
- Identification of Coinfections by Viral and Bacterial Pathogens in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in Peru: Molecular Diagnosis and Clinical Characteristics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Advances and insights in the diagnosis of viral infections.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
- Clinical performance of the Abbott Panbio with nasopharyngeal, throat, and saliva swabs among symptomatic individuals with COVID-19.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021Article
- Low circulation of Influenza A and coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among other respiratory viruses during the COVID-19 pandemic in a region of southern Brazil.Journal of medical virology · 2021Article
- An evaluation of the InDevR FluChip-8G insight microarray assay in characterizing influenza a viruses.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2021Article
- A Rapid SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Assay for Low Resource Settings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Different patterns of Influenza A and B detected during early stages of COVID-19 in a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.The Journal of infection · 2020Article
- A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A Systematic Review Analyzing the Prevalence and Circulation of Influenza Viruses in Swine Population Worldwide.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Monitoring for airborne respiratory viruses in a general pediatric ward in Singapore.Journal of public health research · 2019Article
- Panther Fusion® Respiratory Virus Assays for the detection of influenza and other respiratory viruses.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2019Article
- Comparison of Pathogenicity and Transmissibility of Influenza B and D Viruses in Pigs.Viruses · 2019Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance characteristics of three real-time influenza A/B virus reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays and two real-time 2009 H1N1 RT-PCR assays were evaluated using previously characterized clinical specimens. A total of 150 respiratory specimens from children (30 influenza A/H1 virus-, 30 influenza A/H3 virus-, 30 2009 H1N1-, and 30 influenza B virus-positive specimens and 30 influenza virus-negative specimens) were tested with the CDC influenza A/B PCR (CDC), ProFlu(+) multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay (ProFlu(+)), and MGB Alert Influenza A/B & RSV RUO (MGB) assays. A second set of 157 respiratory specimens (100 2009 H1N1-, 22 seasonal influenza A/H1-, and 15 seasonal influenza A/H3-positive specimens and 20 influenza-negative specimens) were tested with a new laboratory-developed 2009 H1N1 RT-PCR and the CDC 2009 H1N1 assay. The overall sensitivities of the CDC, ProFlu(+), and MGB assays for detection of influenza A and B viruses were 100%, 98.3%, and 94%, respectively. The ProFlu(+) assay failed to detect one influenza A/H1 virus-positive specimen and yielded one unresolved result with another influenza A/H1 virus-positive specimen. The MGB assay detected 84/87 (96.5%) of influenza A and B viruses and 26/30 (86.6%) of 2009 H1N1 viruses. The new laboratory-developed 2009 H1N1 RT-PCR assay detected 100/100 (100%) 2009 H1N1 virus-positive specimens, while the CDC SW Inf A and SW H1 PCR assays failed to detect one and three low-positive 2009 H1N1-positive specimens, respectively. The CDC influenza A/B virus assay and the newly developed 2009 H1N1 RT-PCR assay with an internal control can be set up in two separate reactions in the same assay for routine clinical testing to detect influenza A and B viruses and to specifically identify the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.