Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20844213›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2010

Carbapenem Heteroresistance in VIM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates belonging to the same clone: consequences for routine susceptibility testing.

M Tato, M Morosini, L García, S Albertí, M T Coque, R Cantón

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Rapid AST: Possibility of inferring resistance mechanisms with complex phenotypes.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Antibiotic Heteroresistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Single-cell electro-phenotyping for rapid assessment ofSensors and actuators. B, Chemical · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Carbapenem-heteroresistance among isolates of the Enterobacter cloacae complex: is it a real concern?European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M TatoServicio de Microbiología, CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain.
M Morosini
L García
S Albertí
M T Coque
R Cantón
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESResearch Institute of Health Sciences · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Susceptibility results with low reproducibility by the same or different methods have been observed for metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Eighteen VIM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (one per patient) belonging to a single epidemic clone in our hospital (2005 to 2008) but with different susceptibilities to carbapenems were studied. Imipenem MICs ranged from 8 to >128 mg/liter by standard CLSI microdilution, from ≤1 to >8 mg/liter by the semiautomatic Wider system, and from 0.75 to >32 mg/liter by Etest. Meropenem MICs ranged from 0.5 to 128, ≤1 to >8, and 0.38 to >32 mg/liter, respectively. Ertapenem MICs by CLSI microdilution and Etest ranged from 1 to 64 and 0.75 to >32 mg/liter, respectively. The rates of essential agreement (±1 log(2) dilution) for imipenem and meropenem MICs between the Wider system and the reference microdilution method were 45% and 49%, respectively. Those between Etest and the reference microdilution method for imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem MICs were 33%, 67%, and 84%. The rates of very major errors for the Wider system and Etest were 33% and 28% for imipenem and 25% and 75% for meropenem, respectively. Low MIC reproducibility was observed even when the same inoculum was used (differences up to 4-fold dilutions). Heteroresistance was suspected due to the presence of colonies in the Etest inhibition zone. It was confirmed by population analysis profiles of 4 isolates displaying different imipenem MICs, with the exception of an OmpK36-porin-deficient isolate that homogeneously expressed carbapenem resistance (MIC, >128 mg/liter). Low carbapenem MIC reproducibility could be due to the presence of resistant subpopulations and variable expression of the resistance mechanisms. Since carbapenem MICs are not good markers of MBL production, reliable and reproducible phenotypic methods are needed to detect the presence of this mechanism.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing Techniquesbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsDNA FingerprintingGenotypeHumansKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsVIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase

Identifiers

PMID20844213
PMCPMC3020823
OpenAlexW2152423872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.