Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20843883›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Quality of care for chronic diseases in a British cohort of long-term cancer survivors.

Nada F Khan, David Mant, Peter W Rose

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2018
    Article
  5. Outcomes of preexisting diabetes mellitus in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cancer survivorship: the impact on primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nada F KhanDepartment of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, UK. nada.khan@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
David Mant
Peter W Rose
University of Oxford · GBPrimary Health Care · QA

Funding

Cancer Research UK C23140/A8854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious research has shown that long-term cancer survivors with other chronic diseases may receive poorer care for those diseases compared with the general population. We sought to establish the quality of care for chronic diseases among cancer survivors in the United Kingdom.

methodsFrom the UK General Practice Research Database, we identified 21,366 adult patients who had survived 5 or more years after a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer with a diagnosis of hypertension, coronary artery disease, diabetes, or cerebrovascular disease. For each patient, an age-sex matched noncancer control patient was selected from the same general practice and with the same chronic disease. We compared the chronic disease care in cancer survivors and their matched controls.

resultsThe proportion of patients meeting quality standards for chronic disease care was high in both cancer survivors and control patients. Although cancer survivors were slightly less likely to receive blood pressure monitoring and cholesterol tests, this difference was no longer apparent if patients who died during the study period were excluded. For instance, 93% of breast cancer survivors received blood pressure monitoring compared with 94% of matched control patients. Similarly, control of disease was comparable among all patients, with the exception of diabetic prostate cancer survivors, who had fewer cholesterol readings under the control limit (17% reduction, 95% CI, 7%-26%) and diabetic colorectal survivors, who had fewer calendar quarters of glycated hemoglobin control (12% reduction, 95% CI, 2%-23%).

conclusionsCare of comorbidities is not neglected in the United Kingdom because people have had a previous diagnosis of cancer. One explanation is that in the United Kingdom, such care is provided through a robust primary care system.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurvivorsAgedBreast NeoplasmsChronic DiseaseColorectal NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID20843883
PMCPMC2939417
OpenAlexW2130531927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.