Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20843839›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2010

Human endothelial stem/progenitor cells, angiogenic factors and vascular repair.

Suzanne M Watt, Athanasios Athanassopoulos, Adrian L Harris, Grigorios Tsaknakis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Altered microRNA profile during fracture healing in rats with diabetes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Kinetic analyses of vasculogenesis inform mechanistic studies.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Natural products against cancer angiogenesis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and stroke.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Endothelial progenitor cells: the promise of cell-based therapies for acute lung injury.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne M WattStem Cell Laboratory and Stem Cells and Immunotherapies, NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. suzanne.watt@nhsbt.nhs.uk
Athanasios Athanassopoulos
Adrian L Harris
Grigorios Tsaknakis
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0310-1003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neovascularization or new blood vessel formation is of utmost importance not only for tissue and organ development and for tissue repair and regeneration, but also for pathological processes, such as tumour development. Despite this, the endothelial lineage, its origin, and the regulation of endothelial development and function either intrinsically from stem cells or extrinsically by proangiogenic supporting cells and other elements within local and specific microenvironmental niches are still not fully understood. There can be no doubt that for most tissues and organs, revascularization represents the holy grail for tissue repair, with autologous endothelial stem/progenitor cells, their proangiogenic counterparts and the products of these cells all being attractive targets for therapeutic intervention. Historically, a great deal of controversy has surrounded the identification and origin of cells and factors that contribute to revascularization, the use of such cells or their products as biomarkers to predict and monitor tissue damage and repair or tumour progression and therapeutic responses, and indeed their efficacy in revascularizing and repairing damaged tissues. Here, we will review the role of endothelial progenitor cells and of supporting proangiogenic cells and their products, principally in humans, as diagnostic and therapeutic agents for wound repair and tissue regeneration.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalEndothelial CellsHumansNeovascularization, PhysiologicRegenerative MedicineStem CellsTissue EngineeringWound HealingAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID20843839
PMCPMC2988281
OpenAlexW2104418743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.