Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20843826›Full record

ReviewHuman molecular genetics2010

Analysis of next-generation genomic data in cancer: accomplishments and challenges.

Li Ding, Michael C Wendl, Daniel C Koboldt, Elaine R Mardis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human molecular genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. RD-OMICS: An Integrative Multi-Omics Data Inventory in Rare Diseases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in genetics · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Radiogenomics in brain, breast, and lung cancer: opportunities and challenges.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021
    Review
  10. Radiogenomics Based on PET Imaging.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomics of adult and pediatric solid tumors.American journal of cancer research · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li DingDepartment of Genetics, The Genome Center at Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park Blvd., St Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Michael C Wendl
Daniel C Koboldt
Elaine R Mardis

Funding

Large Scale Genome SequencingU54HG003079 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUTCHER, SUSAN K · 2004 to 2016
$445.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of next-generation sequencing technology has produced a transformation in cancer genomics, generating large data sets that can be analyzed in different ways to answer a multitude of questions about the genomic alterations associated with the disease. Analytical approaches can discover focused mutations such as substitutions and small insertion/deletions, large structural alterations and copy number events. As our capacity to produce such data for multiple cancers of the same type is improving, so are the demands to analyze multiple tumor genomes simultaneously growing. For example, pathway-based analyses that provide the full mutational impact on cellular protein networks and correlation analyses aimed at revealing causal relationships between genomic alterations and clinical presentations are both enabled. As the repertoire of data grows to include mRNA-seq, non-coding RNA-seq and methylation for multiple genomes, our challenge will be to intelligently integrate data types and genomes to produce a coherent picture of the genetic basis of cancer.

Indexed as

GenomicsHumansNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20843826
PMCPMC2953747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.