Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20843333›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2010

Differential cell reaction upon Toll-like receptor 4 and 9 activation in human alveolar and lung interstitial macrophages.

Jessica Hoppstädter, Britta Diesel, Robert Zarbock, Tanja Breinig, Dominik Monz, Marcus Koch, Andreas Meyerhans, Ludwig Gortner, Claus-Michael Lehr, Hanno Huwer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. TREM2Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The innate immune brakes of the lung.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica HoppstädterPharmaceutical Biology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Britta Diesel
Robert Zarbock
Tanja Breinig
Dominik Monz
Marcus Koch
Andreas Meyerhans
Ludwig Gortner
Claus-Michael Lehr
Hanno Huwer
Alexandra K Kiemer
Saarland University · DELeibniz-Institute for New Materials · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvestigations on pulmonary macrophages (MΦ) mostly focus on alveolar MΦ (AM) as a well-defined cell population. Characteristics of MΦ in the interstitium, referred to as lung interstitial MΦ (IM), are rather ill-defined. In this study we therefore aimed to elucidate differences between AM and IM obtained from human lung tissue.

methodsHuman AM and IM were isolated from human non-tumor lung tissue from patients undergoing lung resection. Cell morphology was visualized using either light, electron or confocal microscopy. Phagocytic activity was analyzed by flow cytometry as well as confocal microscopy. Surface marker expression was measured by flow cytometry. Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression patterns as well as cytokine expression upon TLR4 or TLR9 stimulation were assessed by real time RT-PCR and cytokine protein production was measured using a fluorescent bead-based immunoassay.

resultsIM were found to be smaller and morphologically more heterogeneous than AM, whereas phagocytic activity was similar in both cell types. HLA-DR expression was markedly higher in IM compared to AM. Although analysis of TLR expression profiles revealed no differences between the two cell populations, AM and IM clearly varied in cell reaction upon activation. Both MΦ populations were markedly activated by LPS as well as DNA isolated from attenuated mycobacterial strains (M. bovis H37Ra and BCG). Whereas AM expressed higher amounts of inflammatory cytokines upon activation, IM were more efficient in producing immunoregulatory cytokines, such as IL10, IL1ra, and IL6.

conclusionAM appear to be more effective as a non-specific first line of defence against inhaled pathogens, whereas IM show a more pronounced regulatory function. These dissimilarities should be taken into consideration in future studies on the role of human lung MΦ in the inflammatory response.

Indexed as

Macrophage ActivationCells, CulturedExtracellular FluidHumansLigandsLungMacrophages, AlveolarPhagocytosisToll-Like Receptor 1Toll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4Toll-Like Receptor 8Toll-Like Receptor 9LigandsTLR2 protein, humanTLR4 protein, humanTLR8 protein, humanTLR9 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 1Toll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4Toll-Like Receptor 8Toll-Like Receptor 9

Identifiers

PMID20843333
PMCPMC2949727
OpenAlexW2118233058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.