ArticleExpert review of molecular diagnostics2010
Classification of pathogenic or benign status of CNVs detected by microarray analysis.
Article in Expert review of molecular diagnostics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiclass Cancer Prediction Based on Copy Number Variation Using Deep Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- 17p13.3 Microduplication Syndrome: Further Delineating the Clinical Spectrum.Journal of pediatric genetics · 2021Article
- BACs-on-Beads™ assay, a rapid aneuploidy test, improves the diagnostic yield of conventional karyotyping.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple lines of evidence indicated that microarray analysis has a better diagnostic yield of clinically significant genetic changes than do conventional methods in patients with constitutional abnormalities. However, interpretation of microarray data is complicated by the presence of both novel and recurrent copy number variants (CNVs) of unknown significance. To address this issue, Hehir-Kwa et al. described a new computational method for determining the pathogenicity between benign and mental retardation (MR)-associated CNVs among patients with MR. This study demonstrated the value of objectively prioritizing MR-associated CNVs using structural and functional genomic features in diagnostics. In this regard, we discuss an evidence-based summary of how to classify pathogenic or benign status of a CNV in clinical genetics and advocate that there is a need for algorithmic adjustment between constitutional cytogenetic and prenatal diagnosis settings.
Identifiers
20843196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.