Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842593›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2010

Primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Manmeet S Ahluwalia, David M Peereboom

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manmeet S AhluwaliaBrain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center/Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue R35, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
David M Peereboom
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementManagement goals for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) include long-term disease control, management of neurologic complications, and preservation of neurocognitive function. Various treatment options can achieve several of these goals. Chemotherapy as monotherapy or as combination therapy has emerged as the cornerstone of therapy for patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL. Outside of a clinical trial, patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL should receive high-dose intravenous methotrexate (MTX) as a single agent or as part of a combination regimen with radiation therapy reserved for relapse. The regimen should have an adequate MTX dose (>3 g/m(2)) to reach cytotoxic concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to treat occult leptomeningeal disease (LMD). Alternative modes of chemotherapy delivery for selected patients, preferably in the context of a clinical trial, include high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue and intra-arterial chemotherapy with blood-brain barrier disruption. Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in standard doses and fractionation carries an unacceptable rate of long-term neurocognitive toxicity. However, lower doses in daily divided fractions may offer the possibility of adding this modality with preservation of cognition but should be performed only in the context of a clinical trial. The long-term efficacy and toxicity of this approach is currently under investigation. Certain presentations of PCNSL require different strategies. Patients with ocular lymphoma at diagnosis should receive high-dose MTX as this drug can reach cytotoxic intravitreal concentrations. Recurrence in the eyes is managed with intravitreal chemotherapy including MTX or rituximab or with radiation therapy. The field of treatment (eyes vs whole brain) should be individualized. Intrathecal (IT) MTX should be included in the treatment regimen for those patients with a positive CSF cytology, or in regimens in which lower doses of MTX are delivered over longer periods of time. It is probably reasonable to withhold IT chemotherapy in those patients who have no detectable subarachnoid disease and who can receive higher doses of MTX (>3 g/m(2)) over shorter infusion periods (2-4 h). Patients who develop leptomeningeal involvement despite high- dose MTX can be managed with IT chemotherapy such as liposomal cytarabine or MTX or even rituximab. Areas of bulky or symptomatic LMD should probably be treated with radiation therapy as well. Because PCNSL is an uncommon disease, entry into clinical trials must be pursued to advance the state of the art.

Identifiers

PMID20842593
OpenAlexW2319411954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.