Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842585›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2010

Neuromyelitis optica.

William M Carroll, Kazuo Fujihara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Rare Presentation of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Immune mediated diseases and immune modulation in the neurocritical care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Management of optic neuritis.Indian journal of ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William M CarrollDepartment of Neurology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and the Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders Australian Neuromuscular Research Institute, University of Western Australia, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia, William.Carroll@health.wa.gov.au.
Kazuo Fujihara
Tohoku University · JPUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementNeuromyelitis optica (NMO) or Devic's disease typically involves the optic nerves and the spinal cord and is most often relapsing. The pathogenesis is one of an acute inflammatory process targeting astrocytes and resulting in demyelination, as well as axonal injury. In a high proportion of recognized cases of NMO, there is a highly specific autoantibody (NMO-IgG), which is directed to the common central nervous system water channel, aquaporin-4. NMO attacks usually result in severe residual visual impairment or myelopathy. Despite the publication of new diagnostic criteria for NMO, uncertainty at the time of the index event as to whether the attack is due to multiple sclerosis or NMO can cause therapeutic hesitancy. Nevertheless, whenever a reasonable degree of suspicion exists, therapies directed to limiting acute injury and to preventing subsequent further injury mediated by humoral mechanisms should be instituted immediately. Investigations can then be completed and the therapeutic direction confirmed.For an acute attack, high-dose methylprednisolone and plasma exchange (generally given sequentially) are most useful.For the prevention of further attacks, selective or nonselective immunosuppressive therapy directed to humoral mechanisms is preferred. Agents recommended are oral azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil with or without low-dose prednisolone or rituximab. Therapy should be planned to continue for up to 5 years in all patients, including those with a single attack who are at high risk of further relapse.Regrettably, there are no controlled trials for the treatment of either the classic manifestations of NMO or the so-called limited manifestations known as NMO spectrum disorders. The therapeutic opinions expressed in this article are therefore based on the current understanding of the pathogenesis of this disorder, reports of small series of patients receiving a range of treatments, and expert opinions.

Identifiers

PMID20842585
OpenAlexW4230663771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.