ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2010
Myasthenia gravis.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World experience with efgartigimod in patients with myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: For Cancer Patients.Cancer management and research · 2022Review
- The emerging role of tacrolimus in myasthenia gravis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2015Review
- Treatment of ocular myasthenia gravis.Current treatment options in neurology · 2012Article
- Neuromuscular disease: acute treatment for myasthenia gravis.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2011Article
- Myasthenia gravis: a review of available treatment approaches.Autoimmune diseases · 2011Article
- Treatment of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders.Current treatment options in neurology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementTreatment of patients with acquired (autoimmune) myasthenia gravis should rely on evidence-based therapeutic choices, taking into account the individual's needs according to disease severity (mild to severe), extent (ocular or generalized), comorbidities (including other autoimmune diseases, infections, thymoma, and pregnancy), age, iatrogenic factors (the risks and benefits of therapy), patient autonomy and quality of life, financial burden to the patient, and associated health care costs. Therapy is aimed at managing symptoms by improving neuromuscular junction transmission (cholinesterase inhibitors) and/or modifying the underlying immunopathogenetic cause of acquired myasthenia gravis via immunosuppression or immunomodulation. Myasthenic patients with operable thymoma should be referred for surgery and closely followed up for tumor recurrence. A concerted international effort is addressing treatment recommendations for thymectomy in myasthenic patients with no radiologic evidence of thymoma who are positive for circulating acetylcholine receptor antibodies. There is a lack of evidence-based treatment guidelines for both acute and long-term management of ocular myasthenia. Acute management of myasthenic crisis requires intensive monitoring of the patient and institution of an efficient and safe treatment such as plasma exchange. Patient education is essential to a comprehensive long-term treatment plan.
Identifiers
20842584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.