Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842583›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2010

Treatment of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders.

John E Greenlee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Paraneoplastic neurological complications of breast cancer.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: general treatment overview.Current treatment options in neurology · 2013
    Article
  12. Treatment of paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.Current treatment options in neurology · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Current approaches to the treatment of paraneoplastic encephalitis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John E GreenleeClinical Neuroscience Center, University of Utah, 175 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA, john.greenlee@hsc.utah.edu.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementParaneoplastic neurologic disorders are rare, autoimmune disorders, which can be broken down into two groups: those in which antibody response is directed against intracellular neuronal or neuroglial proteins (Group 1) and those in which the immune response is directed against antigens within or subjacent to the neuronal cell membrane (Group 2). In both groups, detection and treatment of the underlying neoplasm is critical and carries the best chance of clinical stabilization or remission.Syndromes in Group 2 frequently respond to therapy. This may involve corticosteroids, plasma exchange (PE), or intravenous immunoglobulin G (IgG), depending on the specific paraneoplastic syndrome. Cyclophosphamide or rituximab may be helpful in patients who fail to stabilize or improve on less aggressive therapies.Treatment of syndromes in Group 1 is far more difficult, and proven treatment strategies do not exist. Younger men (< 40 years of age) with limbic or brainstem syndromes, testicular or germ cell tumors, and anti-Ma2 antibodies may respond to specific tumor treatment together with immunotherapy. Patients with paraneoplastic syndromes and anti-Ri antibodies may respond to corticosteroids and/or cyclophosphamide. Evidence-based treatment guidelines do not exist for patients with other central paraneoplastic syndromes such as cerebellar degeneration or encephalomyeloneuritis. Approaches to therapy, apart from treating the underlying tumor, are thus speculative.In patients with rapidly progressive symptoms classically suggestive of a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome, time is of the essence in arresting neurologic deterioration. Clinical improvement in patients with longstanding symptoms is unlikely. At the outset, one should move rapidly to define the antibody response involved, as this may also assist tumor diagnosis. Treatment may include prednisone, intravenous IgG, and cyclophosphamide; rituximab plus prednisone may be an alternative, either initially or in the face of continued disease progression despite treatment with intravenous IgG or cyclophosphamide. Although PE is of questionable benefit, a single cycle of PE may be considered before other treatment, to achieve rapid lowering of circulating paraneoplastic autoantibodies.

Identifiers

PMID20842583
OpenAlexW1976479328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.