Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842578›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2010

Reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke.

David Goldemund, Robert Mikulik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David GoldemundDepartment of Neurology, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital, Pekarská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
Robert Mikulik
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementIschemic stroke is most often caused by an acute extracranial or intracranial thromboembolic lesion obstructing an artery. It has been demonstrated that recanalization is the most important modifiable predictor of a good clinical outcome. Reperfusion strategies focus on early reopening of the vessel to reestablish antegrade flow within the penumbra.Current standard therapy within 4.5 h is intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA, 0.9 mg/kg body weight, maximum dose 90 mg). Thrombolytic therapy appears to be safe and effective across various types of hospitals, if the treatment is conducted by a physician with stroke expertise.New imaging methods (MR diffusion/perfusion, CT perfusion) are being investigated in order to better select patients who are most likely to benefit from recanalization therapy based on current clinical evidence. Neither perfusion imaging with CT or MR nor the mismatch concept are recommended for routine treatment decisions within or beyond the 4.5 h available for IVT.If major vessel occlusion is proven but IVT is contraindicated, intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) with tPA or mechanical thrombectomy with the Merci Retriever or Penumbra System may be a treatment option. The availability of IAT generally should not preclude the intravenous administration of tPA in otherwise eligible patients. Intra-arterial treatment can be performed within 8 h after stroke onset. Combining intravenous tPA pretreatment with subsequent IAT or mechanical thrombectomy may improve the recanalization rate and may be used as a rescue therapy in cases of persistent major vessel occlusion after unsuccessful IVT.Despite testing, no thrombolytic agent other than tPA (e.g., IIb/IIIa antagonists, heparin, etc.) has yet been approved for routine practice for either intravenous or intra-arterial application, alone or in combination with tPA.Continuous transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring of an occluded vessel may increase the rate of early recanalization after tPA; this effect may be facilitated by the administration of microbubbles. This method is still considered experimental.

Identifiers

PMID20842578
OpenAlexW2151962747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.