Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842571›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2010

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Anti-MAG Neuropathy.

Marinos C Dalakas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Treatment Approaches for Atypical CIDP.Frontiers in neurology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Immune-Mediated Neuropathies.Current treatment options in neurology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Selective in vivo removal of pathogenic anti-MAG autoantibodies, an antigen-specific treatment option for anti-MAG neuropathy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marinos C DalakasImperial College, London, Burlington Danes Building, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Office E517, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK, m.dalakas@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPolyneuropathies associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathies comprise a distinct entity. In spite of the apparent pathogenicity of the IgM antibodies and the specific immunoreactivity to myelin antigens, the disease has been difficult to treat. This review describes the clinical phenotype, addresses recent data on immunoreactivity of IgM to various nerve antigens, and discusses the latest progress on treatment.Most of these patients present with paresthesias and sensory ataxia followed by a varying degree of sensorimotor deficits. In more than 75% of the patients, the monoclonal IgM recognizes myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) and sulfoglucuronyl glycosphingolipid (SGPG), best detected by ELISA, or other peripheral nerve glycolipids. Recent experiments have demonstrated that animals immunized with SGPG develop sensory ataxia, suggesting a pathogenic role for this antigen. Although cladribine, cyclophosphamide with prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin have offered transient benefits to some patients, most have remained treatment-resistant. Open label studies and a recent randomized controlled trial indicate that rituximab is emerging as the best agent available, providing long-term benefits to almost half of these patients. Rituximab appears to work by suppressing the IgM as well as the anti-MAG antibodies and by inducing immunoregulatory T cells. Patients with more sensory deficits and higher anti-MAG antibodies are more likely to respond but may require re-treatment after several months.These encouraging results need confirmation with a larger trial. Data on long-term efficacy and immune markers associated with response to therapy or need for re-treatment are still needed.

Identifiers

PMID20842571
OpenAlexW1989234838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.