ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2010
Treatment of vasovagal syncope: an update.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementVasovagal syncope (VVS) remains the most common cause of syncope and transient loss of consciousness in all age groups. The treatment of VVS focuses on measures that interrupt or prevent its pathophysiologic mechanism, as well as on avoidance of triggers. Although the evidence supporting an increase in salt and water intake is weak, it is a cost-effective and safe strategy that should always be used as first-line therapy. Patients should be educated on how to respond to further episodes of syncope, especially if they experience prodromal warning signs. In these cases, counterpressure maneuvers in younger patients are clearly effective. Orthostatic training exercises may improve symptoms in patients with recurrent VVS; however, this strategy is only effective in younger, highly motivated patients. Multiple medications have been tested in small trials, and there is sparse evidence on efficacy. β-Adrenergic antagonists and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors have shown contradictory results on efficacy in a variety of studies; thus, their use should be restricted. Midodrine is the only drug proven to prevent VVS recurrence; however, no consistent prescription guidelines exist. The ongoing Second Prevention of Syncope Trial (POST II) is investigating the benefits of fludrocortisone in this population. In the meantime, measures such as increased salt and water intake and counterpressure maneuvers should be used in all cases if no contraindications are present. Pharmacologic treatment should be restricted to midodrine and fludrocortisone, with the other treatments as options in highly refractory cases. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker should be a measure of last resort in highly refractory cases, particularly in the cardioinhibitory type of VVS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.