ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2010
Evolving approaches to the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic importance of pathophysiologic markers in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.Circulation. Heart failure · 2014Trial
- Cardiovascular Outcomes with Colchicine in Coronary Artery Disease and HFpEF: A Propensity-Matched TriNetX Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The ARIC Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Natriuretic Peptide Clearance Receptor (NPR-C) Pathway as a Novel Therapeutic Target in Obesity-Related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction - implications for clinical trials.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018Observational
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Older Adults.Heart failure clinics · 2017Review
- Novel plasma and imaging biomarkers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2015Review
- Diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: 10 key lessons.Current cardiology reviews · 2015Review
- Current perspectives on systemic hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Current cardiology reports · 2014Review
- Phenotypic spectrum of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Heart failure clinics · 2014Review
- Developing therapies for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: current state and future directions.JACC. Heart failure · 2014Review
- The emerging epidemic of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Current heart failure reports · 2013Review
- Ventricular remodeling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Current heart failure reports · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementCoronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In studies of HFpEF, the reported prevalence of CAD varies widely, which may be the result of inconsistent definitions of CAD, geographic and ethnic differences in CAD burden, varying definitions of HFpEF (including different cutoffs for "preserved ejection fraction"), and differences in study design. Despite these limitations, pooled analysis of prospective HFpEF studies demonstrates that CAD is common in HFpEF, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 50%. Based on available data, patients with signs and symptoms of heart failure who have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and evidence of CAD (HFpEF-CAD) most likely comprise a distinct etiologic and pathophysiologic subset of HFpEF. Therefore, future clinical trials in HFpEF should a priori stratify by CAD or specifically target patients with CAD, strategies that may improve the disappointing track record of therapies tested in HFpEF. The combination of systematic evaluation and management of CAD in HFpEF, along with promising future therapies for HFpEF-CAD, may lead to improved outcomes for this challenging clinical syndrome.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.