Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842361›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2010

Presence and persistence of nutrition-related symptoms during the first year following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in clinically disease-free patients.

E B Haverkort, J M Binnekade, O R C Busch, M I van Berge Henegouwen, R J de Haan, D J Gouma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02381249 (The Effect of Satiety Gut Hormone Modulation on Appetitive Drive After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02381249 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Satiety Gut Hormone Modulation on Appetitive Drive After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. James's Hospital, IrelandRan2015 to 2018Enrolled40ConditionsEsophageal Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms, Weight Loss, MalnutritionArmsOctreotide, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Experiences and requirements in nutritional management of patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of the nutritional consequences of esophagectomy.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nutrition therapy issues in esophageal cancer.Current gastroenterology reports · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E B HaverkortDepartment of Dietetics, The Academic Medical Center, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.b.haverkort@amc.uva.nl
J M Binnekade
O R C Busch
M I van Berge Henegouwen
R J de Haan
D J Gouma
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction results in a variety of postoperative nutrition-related symptoms that may influence the patient's nutritional status.

methodsWe developed a 15-item questionnaire, focusing on the nutrition-related complaints the first year after an esophagectomy. The questionnaire was filled out the first week after discharge and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The use of enteral nutrition, meal size and frequency, social aspects related to eating, defecation pattern, and body weight were recorded at the same time points. We analyzed the relationship between the baseline characteristics and the number of nutrition-related symptoms, as well as the relationship between those symptoms and body weight with linear mixed models.

resultsWe found no significant within-patient change for the total number of nutrition-related symptoms (P = 0.67). None of the baseline factors were identified as predictors of the complaint scores. The most frequently experienced complaints were early satiety, postprandial dumping syndrome, inhibited passage due to high viscosity, reflux, and absence of hunger. One year after surgery, meal sizes were still smaller, the social aspects of eating were influenced negatively, and patients experienced an altered stool frequency. Directly after the surgical procedure 78% of the patients lost weight, and the entire postoperative year the mean body weight remained lower (P = 0.47). We observed no association between the complaint scores and body weight (P = 0.15).

conclusionsAfter an esophagectomy, most patients struggle with nutrition-related symptoms, are confronted with nutrition-related adjustments and a reduced body weight.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomosis, SurgicalBody WeightDigestive System DiseasesEnteral NutritionEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusNutrition DisordersPlastic Surgery ProceduresStomachSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20842361
PMCPMC2982950
OpenAlexW1963876190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.