Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20842023›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical journal of pain2011

Pressure and activity-related allodynia in delayed-onset muscle pain.

Erin Alice Dannecker, Kathleen A Sluka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical journal of pain, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin Alice DanneckerDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-4250, USA. danneckere@missouri.edu
Kathleen A Sluka
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Measures and Mechanisms of Muscle Pain in HumansK01AR050146 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DANNECKER, ERIN ALICE · 2004 to 2008
$626k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1K01 AR050146-01A1NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR050146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMuscle pain from different activities was tested with the muscle pain expected to vary in ways that may clarify mechanisms of activity-induced exacerbation of myofascial pain.

methodsParticipants [N=20; 45% women; 23 y old (SD=2.09)] consented to participate in a 6 session protocol. Bilateral muscle pain ratings and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were collected before and for 4 days after lengthening (ie, eccentric) muscle contractions were completed with the nondominant elbow flexors to induce delayed-onset muscle pain. The muscle pain ratings were collected with the arms in several conditions (eg, resting, moving, and contracting in a static position) and PPTs were collected with the arms.

resultsIn the ipsilateral arm, muscle pain ratings at rest and during activity significantly increased whereas PPTs significantly decreased after the eccentrics (ηs=0.17 to 0.54). The greatest increases in pain occurred during arm extension without applied load, in which there was more stretching but less force than isometrics. In the contralateral arm, neither muscle pain nor PPTs changed from baseline. DISCUSSION: These results resemble earlier electrophysiology studies showing differential sensitization across stimuli and support that increased depth of information about aggravating activities from clinical patients is needed.

Indexed as

ElbowExerciseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFunctional LateralityHumansHyperalgesiaIsometric ContractionMaleMovementMuscle ContractionMuscular DiseasesPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPressure

Identifiers

PMID20842023
PMCPMC3006079
OpenAlexW2050927254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.