Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20841613›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2010

Dose-dependent delay of the hypoglycemic effect of short-acting insulin analogs in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study.

Maude Gagnon-Auger, Patrick du Souich, Jean-Patrice Baillargeon, Elisabeth Martin, Pascal Brassard, Julie Ménard, Jean-Luc Ardilouze

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical use of U-500 regular insulin: review and meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. One hundred years of insulin therapy.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  13. The Impact of Diet and Exercise on Drug Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Clinical Impact of Initiation of U-500 Insulin vs Continuation of U-100 Insulin in Subjects With Diabetes.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
  15. Modern pharmacological treatment of obese patients.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Delayed Response to U-500 Regular Insulin.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maude Gagnon-AugerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Patrick du Souich
Jean-Patrice Baillargeon
Elisabeth Martin
Pascal Brassard
Julie Ménard
Jean-Luc Ardilouze
Université de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInjected volume and subcutaneous adipose tissue blood flow (ATBF) affect insulin absorption. Pharmacokinetics of short-acting insulin analogs were established by assessing injection of small doses in lean subjects, healthy or with type 1 diabetes. In obese patients, however, daily dosages are larger and ATBF is decreased. This study assessed the kinetics of a short-acting insulin analog in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsEuglycemic clamps after subcutaneous lispro injections were performed. Six healthy control subjects received 10 units. Seven obese (BMI 38.3 ± 7.0 kg/m(2)) subjects with type 2 diabetes received 10, 30, and 50 units. Plasma lispro was measured by specific radioimmunoassay and ATBF by the (133)Xe-washout technique.

resultsATBF was 64% lower in subjects with type 2 diabetes than in control subjects. After 10 units injection, time to lispro plasma peak (T(max)) was similar (48.3 vs. 55.7 min; control subjects versus type 2 diabetic subjects), although maximal concentration (C(max))/dose was 41% lower in subjects with type 2 diabetes, with lower and delayed maximal glucose infusion rate (GIR(max): 9.0 vs. 0.6 mg/kg/min, P < 0.0001, 69 vs. 130 min, P < 0.0001, respectively). After 30- and 50-unit injections, T(max) (88.6 and 130.0 min, respectively) and time to GIR(max) (175 and 245 min) were further delayed and dose related (r(2) = 0.51, P = 0.0004 and r(2) = 0.76, P < 0.0001, respectively).

conclusionsAbsorption and hypoglycemic action of increasing dosages of lispro are critically delayed in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInjections, SubcutaneousInsulinInsulin LisproMaleMiddle AgedObesityYoung AdultHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Lispro

Identifiers

PMID20841613
PMCPMC2992178
OpenAlexW2131594469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.