Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20840818›Full record

SynthesisZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2010

[Comparison of EGFR and KRAS status between primary non-small cell lung cancer and corresponding metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis].

Chengbo Han, Huawei Zou, Jietao Ma, Yang Zhou, Jianzhu Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengbo HanDepartment of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110022, China. hancb@126.com
Huawei Zou
Jietao Ma
Yang Zhou
Jianzhu Zhao
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS status were particularly critical for the choice of first-line targeted therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while the primary tumor and metastases might be different in the EGFR and KRAS gene status. The aim of this pooled analysis is to compare EGFR and KRAS status in matching primary NSCLC and metastases and further to guide clinical practice.

methodsSystematic computerized searches of the Pubmed and Medline databases (up to May 10, 2010) meeting specified search criteria were performed, followed by a further screening according to inclusive and exclusive criteria.

resultsFourteen articles were selected into the final meta-analysis with paired primary and metastatic cases of 598. Expression level of EGFR protein and mutation frequency of KRAS gene in primary tumors were higher than that in metastases, relative risk (RR)=1.13 (95%CI: 0.98-1.31, P=0.09) and RR=1.39 (95%CI: 0.95-2.03, P=0.09), respectively. EGFR gene copy number in metastases was higher than that in primary tumor, RR=0.74 (95%CI: 0.53-1.02, P=0.06). There was no statistically significant difference of EGFR mutation frequency in primary tumors and metastases (P=0.31). The discordant rate in primary and metastases was 17.09% for EGFR mutation, 27.07% for EGFR amplification, 27.84% for EGFR protein expression and 25.91% for KRAS mutation.

conclusionsThe systematic analysis showed that the EGFR mutation status in primary lung cancer and corresponding metastases was more stable than KRAS gene. KRAS mutation in primary lung cancerous foci seems to better reflect systemically cancerous genetic characteristics of KRAS gene. Determination of KRAS gene status based merely on metastatic foci might lead to more resistant selections of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Combined detection of EGFR and KRAS mutation from primary NSCLC foci might serve as a better predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsHumansLung NeoplasmsMutationNeoplasm MetastasisProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20840818
PMCPMC6000337
OpenAlexW1507780106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.