Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20840166›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2010

Impact of nuclear organization and dynamics on epigenetic regulation in the central nervous system: implications for neurological disease states.

Irfan A Qureshi, Mark F Mehler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ribosomal DNA and Neurological Disorders.Current molecular medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Epigenetic mechanisms underlying nervous system diseases.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An evolving view of epigenetic complexity in the brain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  8. Emotion: The Self-regulatory Sense.Global advances in health and medicine · 2014
    Article
  9. Novel higher-order epigenetic regulation of the Bdnf gene upon seizures.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in epigenetics and epigenomics for neurodegenerative diseases.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irfan A QureshiRosyln and Leslie Goldstein Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Mark F Mehler
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Mechanisms Regulating Astroglial Lineage DevelopmentR01MH066290 · NIMH · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 2002 to 2006
$1.8M
Neurodegenerative Diseases: A New Class of Primary Developmental Disorders?R01NS071571 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
REGULATION OF POSTNATAL CORTICAL MULTIPOTENT PROGENITORSR01NS038902 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI MEHLER, MARK F · 1999 to 2002
$886k
NIMH NIH HHS MH66290NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066290NINDS NIH HHS NS07157NINDS NIH HHS NS38902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038902NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic mechanisms that are highly responsive to interoceptive and environmental stimuli mediate the proper execution of complex genomic programs, such as cell type-specific gene transcription and posttranscriptional RNA processing, and are increasingly thought to be important for modulating the development, homeostasis, and plasticity of the central nervous system (CNS). These epigenetic processes include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling, all of which play roles in neural cellular diversity, connectivity, and plasticity. Further, large-scale transcriptomic analyses have revealed that the eukaryotic genome is pervasively transcribed, forming interleaved protein-coding RNAs and regulatory nonprotein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), which act through a broad array of molecular mechanisms. Most of these ncRNAs are transcribed in a cell type- and developmental stage-specific manner in the CNS. A broad array of posttranscriptional processes, such as RNA editing and transport, can modulate the functions of both protein-coding RNAs and ncRNAs. Additional studies implicate nuclear organization and dynamics in mediating epigenetic regulation. The compartmentalization of DNA sequences and other molecular machinery into functional nuclear domains, such as transcription factories, Cajal bodies, promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies, nuclear speckles, and paraspeckles, some of which are found prominently in neural cells, is associated with regulation of transcriptional activity and posttranscriptional RNA processing. These observations suggest that genomic architecture and RNA biology in the CNS are much more complex and nuanced than previously appreciated. Increasing evidence now suggests that most, if not all, human CNS diseases are associated with either primary or secondary perturbations in one or more aspects of the epigenome. In this review, we provide an update of our emerging understanding of genomic architecture, RNA biology, and nuclear organization and highlight the interconnected roles that deregulation of these factors may play in diverse CNS disorders.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusCentral Nervous SystemEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNervous System DiseasesRNA EditingRNA, UntranslatedRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID20840166
PMCPMC2946117
OpenAlexW1586651806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.