Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20838804›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2010

Estimating wound age: looking into the future.

Rossana Cecchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Clue on the Skin: A Systematic Review on Immunohistochemical Analyses of the Ligature Mark.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epigenetic analyses in forensic medicine: future and challenges.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Skin injuries in forensic histopathology: a descriptive study.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multidisciplinary Forensic Approach in "Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cytokines as new biomarkers of skin wound vitality.International journal of legal medicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rossana CecchiDipartimento di Medicina Legale, Università La Sapienza Roma, Rome, Italy. rossana.cecchi@uniroma1.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical review is made of the studies on wound healing used for forensic purposes, focusing on the problem of which characteristics indicate that a parameter could be used as evidence in court. A panel analysing the more important information obtained by each marker is given, and a perspective of what might be expected from future research is discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell Adhesion MoleculesCell MovementCell SurvivalEndothelial CellsExpert TestimonyForecastingForensic PathologyHumansInflammation MediatorsMiceProteomicsTime FactorsWound HealingWounds and InjuriesBiomarkersCell Adhesion MoleculesInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.