Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20838672›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2010

Micromolded arrays for separation of adherent cells.

Yuli Wang, Colleen Phillips, Wei Xu, Jeng-Hao Pai, Rahul Dhopeshwarkar, Christopher E Sims, Nancy Allbritton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microraft arrays for serial-killer CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells and single cell isolation.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2023
    Article
  7. Adding a Chemical Biology Twist to CRISPR Screening.Israel journal of chemistry · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Platforms for Single-Cell Collection and Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuli WangDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Colleen Phillips
Wei Xu
Jeng-Hao Pai
Rahul Dhopeshwarkar
Christopher E Sims
Nancy Allbritton
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Rapid Genetic Engineering of Stem CellsR01HG004843 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ALLBRITTON, NANCY L. · 2009 to 2012
$2.2M
Micropallet Arrays for Separation of Single Cells and ColoniesR01EB007612 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ALLBRITTON, NANCY L. · 2007 to 2010
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG4843NHGRI NIH HHS HG4843S1NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004843NIBIB NIH HHS EB7612NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an efficient, yet inexpensive, approach for isolating viable single cells or colonies from a mixed population. This cell microarray platform possesses innovations in both the array manufacture and the manner of target cell release. Arrays of microwells with bases composed of detachable concave elements, termed microrafts, were fabricated by a dip-coating process using a polydimethylsiloxane mold as the template and the array substrate. This manufacturing approach enabled the use of materials other than photoresists to create the array elements. Thus microrafts possessing low autofluorescence could be fabricated for fluorescence-based identification of cells. Cells plated on the microarray settled and attached at the center of the wells due to the microrafts' concavity. Individual microrafts were readily dislodged by the action of a needle inserted through the compliant polymer substrate. The hard polymer material (polystyrene or epoxy resin) of which the microrafts were composed protected the cells from damage by the needle. For cell analysis and isolation, cells of interest were identified using a standard inverted microscope and microrafts carrying target cells were dislodged with the needle. The released cells/microrafts could be efficiently collected, cultured and clonally expanded. During the separation and collection procedures, the cells remained adherent and provided a measure of protection during manipulation, thus providing an extremely high single-cell cloning rate (>95%). Generation of a transfected cell line based on expression of a fluorescent protein demonstrated an important application for performing on-chip cell separations.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell SeparationDimethylpolysiloxanesExtracellular MatrixFluorescenceGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20838672
PMCPMC2994190
OpenAlexW1972223695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.