Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20838646›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2010

Taenia solium cysticercosis in the Democratic Republic of Congo: how does pork trade affect the transmission of the parasite?

Nicolas Praet, Kirezi Kanobana, Constantin Kabwe, Vivi Maketa, Philippe Lukanu, Pascal Lutumba, Katja Polman, Peter Matondo, Niko Speybroeck, Pierre Dorny and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evidence for Transmission ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Demand forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  10. Case Report: Three Cases of Neurocysticercosis in Central Africa.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  11. DNA-Detection Based Diagnostics forJournal of parasitology research · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas PraetInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. npraet@itg.be
Kirezi Kanobana
Constantin Kabwe
Vivi Maketa
Philippe Lukanu
Pascal Lutumba
Katja Polman
Peter Matondo
Niko Speybroeck
Pierre Dorny
Julienne Sumbu
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BENational Institute of Biomedical Research · CDUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Kinshasa · CDUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaenia solium, a zoonotic parasite that is endemic in most developing countries where pork is consumed, is recognised as the main cause of acquired epilepsy in these regions. T. solium has been reported in almost all of the neighboring countries of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) but data on the current prevalence of the disease in the country itself are lacking. This study, focusing on porcine cysticercosis (CC), makes part of a first initiative to assess whether cysticercosis is indeed actually present in DRC.

methodsAn epidemiological study on porcine CC was conducted (1) on urban markets of Kinshasa where pork is sold and (2) in villages in Bas-Congo province where pigs are traditionally reared. Tongue inspection and ELISA for the detection of circulating antigen of the larval stage of T. solium were used to assess the prevalence of active CC in both study sites.

findingsThe overall prevalence of pigs with active cysticercosis did not significantly differ between the market and the village study sites (38.8 [CI 95%: 34-43] versus 41.2% [CI 95%: 33-49], respectively). However, tongue cysticercosis was only found in the village study site together with a significantly higher intensity of infection (detected by ELISA).

interpretationPigs reared at village level are sold for consumption on Kinshasa markets, but it seems that highly infected animals are excluded at a certain level in the pig trade chain. Indeed, preliminary informal surveys on common practices conducted in parallel revealed that pig farmers and/or buyers select the low infected animals and exclude those who are positive by tongue inspection at village level. This study provides the only recent evidence of CC presence in DRC and gives the first estimates to fill an important gap on the African taeniasis/cysticercosis distribution map.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, HelminthCysticercosisDemocratic Republic of the CongoEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansMeatSwineSwine DiseasesTaeniasisTaenia soliumTongueAntibodies, Helminth

Identifiers

PMID20838646
PMCPMC2935392
OpenAlexW2170776415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.