ArticleIndian journal of pharmaceutical sciences2010
Antibacterial Activity of some Medicinal Mangroves against Antibiotic Resistant Pathogenic Bacteria.
Article in Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities ofMarine drugs · 2024Review
- Anti-pathogenicity of Acanthus ilicifolius leaf extracts against A. hydrophila infection in Labeo rohita fingerlings.AMB Express · 2023Article
- Challenging Structure Elucidation of Lumnitzeralactone, an Ellagic Acid Derivative from the MangroveMarine drugs · 2023Article
- Halophytes as new model plant species for salt tolerance strategies.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Using of Essential Oils and Plant Extracts againstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Identification of Potential Diuretic and Laxative Drug Candidates fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of the Extracts of Different Parts ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Ethnopharmacology, Phytochemistry, and Global Distribution of Mangroves-A Comprehensive Review.Marine drugs · 2019Review
- Antimicrobial compounds from mangrove plants: A pharmaceutical prospective.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2014Review
- Anti-quorum sensing potential of the mangrove Rhizophora annamalayana.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2013Article
- Inhibitory Activity of Avicennia marina, a Medicinal Plant in Persian Folk Medicine, against HIV and HSV.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2013Article
- Antibacterial Activity of Mangrove Leaf Extracts against Human Pathogens.Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antibacterial activity of the leaves and bark of mangrove plants, Avicennia marina, A. officinalis, Bruguiera sexangula, Exoecaria agallocha, Lumnitzera racemosa, and Rhizophora apiculata was evaluated against antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus sp. Soxhlet extracts of petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, ethanol and water were prepared and evaluated the antibacterial activity using agar diffusion method. Most of the plant extracts showed promising antibacterial activity against both bacterial species. However, higher antibacterial activity was observed for Staphylococcus aureus than Proteus sp. The highest antibacterial activity was shown by ethyl acetate of mature leaf extracts of E. agallocha for Staphylococcus aureus. All ethyl acetate extracts showed higher inhibition against S. aureus while some extracts of chloroform, ethyl acetate and ethanol gave inhibition against Proteus sp. None of the petroleum ether and aqueous extracts showed inhibition against Proteus sp. All fresh plant materials did also show more antibacterial activity against both bacterial strains than did dried plant extracts. Antibacterial activity of fresh and dried plant materials reduced for both bacterial strains with time after extraction. Since L. racemosa and A. marina gave the best inhibition for bacterial species, they were used for further investigations. Charcoal treated plant extracts of L. racemosa and A. marina were able to inhibit both bacterial strains more than those of untreated plant extracts. Phytochemical screening of mature leaf, bark of L. racemosa and leaf extracts of A. marina has been carried out and revealed that leaf and bark contained alkaloids, steroids, triterpenoids and flavonoids. None of the above extracts indicate the presence of saponins and cardiac glycosides. Separated bands of extracts by TLC analysis showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.