Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20838380›Full record

ReviewOncogene2010

Serine/threonine phosphatases in the DNA damage response and cancer.

A Peng, J L Maller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The ATM-E6AP-MASTL axis mediates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PP2A Phosphatase as an Emerging Viral Host Factor.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Kinase Signaling in Dendritic Development and Disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  12. The Clinical Significance ofOncoTargets and therapy · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. mBio · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A PengHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Aimin.Peng@unmc.edu
J L Maller
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular response to DNA damage is a crucial surveillance mechanism that maintains genomic integrity and prevents cancer progression. Previous studies identified multiple Ser/Thr protein kinases that have pivotal roles in the activation of this response. It is interesting that a growing body of evidence suggests that these kinases and their substrates are under tight modulation by numerous Ser/Thr phosphatases. In this study, we review recent reports that reveal new functions and regulation of these phosphatases. Similar to the kinases in this pathway, phosphatases may also be intimately involved in cancer progression and present valuable targets for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicNeoplasmsPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesSignal TransductionPhosphoprotein Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID20838380
OpenAlexW2084374292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.