Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20837995›Full record

ArticleGenetics2010

Evolution of the Drosophila feminizing switch gene Sex-lethal.

Thomas W Cline, Maia Dorsett, Sha Sun, Melissa M Harrison, Jessica Dines, Louise Sefton, Lisa Megna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Theme and variation in the evolution of insect sex determination.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Review
  6. Evolution of sexual development and sexual dimorphism in insects.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  7. InSexBase: an annotated genomic resource of sex chromosomes and sex-biased genes in insects.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Royal Society open science · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Drosophila switch gene Sex-lethal can bypass its switch-gene target transformer to regulate aspects of female behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas W ClineDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3204, USA. sxlcline@berkeley.edu
Maia Dorsett
Sha Sun
Melissa M Harrison
Jessica Dines
Louise Sefton
Lisa Megna

Funding

REGULATION OF SEX-SPECIFIC GENES IN DROSOPHILAR01GM023468 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CLINE, THOMAS W · 1986 to 2006
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM23468NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM023468Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 038110Z93Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila melanogaster, the gene Sex-lethal (Sxl) controls all aspects of female development. Since melanogaster males lacking Sxl appear wild type, Sxl would seem to be functionally female specific. Nevertheless, in insects as diverse as honeybees and houseflies, Sxl seems not to determine sex or to be functionally female specific. Here we describe three lines of work that address the questions of how, when, and even whether the ancestor of melanogaster Sxl ever shed its non-female-specific functions. First, to test the hypothesis that the birth of Sxl's closest paralog allowed Sxl to lose essential ancestral non-female-specific functions, we determined the CG3056 null phenotype. That phenotype failed to support this hypothesis. Second, to define when Sxl might have lost ancestral non-female-specific functions, we isolated and characterized Sxl mutations in D. virilis, a species distant from melanogaster and notable for the large amount of Sxl protein expression in males. We found no change in Sxl regulation or functioning in the 40+ MY since these two species diverged. Finally, we discovered conserved non-sex-specific Sxl mRNAs containing a previously unknown, potentially translation-initiating exon, and we identified a conserved open reading frame starting in Sxl male-specific exon 3. We conclude that Drosophila Sxl may appear functionally female specific not because it lost non-female-specific functions, but because those functions are nonessential in the laboratory. The potential evolutionary relevance of these nonessential functions is discussed.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenes, SwitchAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMaleMolecular Sequence DataMutationRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerSex Determination ProcessesSex FactorsSpecies SpecificityDrosophila ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerSxl protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID20837995
PMCPMC2998314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.