Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20837541›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

CD4 and CD8 binding to MHC molecules primarily acts to enhance Lck delivery.

Maxim N Artyomov, Mieszko Lis, Srinivas Devadas, Mark M Davis, Arup K Chakraborty

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CD8 co-receptor modulates the specificity profile of the 1G4 TCR against NY-ESO-1.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A conserved element in the first intron ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  14. TCR Signals Controlling Adaptive Immunity against Toxoplasma and Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Strategies and rules for tuning TCR-derived therapy.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Factors contributing to the potency of CD8Trends in immunology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maxim N ArtyomovDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Mieszko Lis
Srinivas Devadas
Mark M Davis
Arup K Chakraborty
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USBroad Institute · USRagon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard · USStanford University · US

Funding

Visualizing, Quantifying, and Modeling of T Cell Response to Listeria InfectionP01AI071195 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUSTIN, MICHAEL LORAN · 2006 to 2010
$8.1M
NIAID NIH HHS 1P01AI071195/01NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI071195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activation of T lymphocytes (T cells) requires signaling through the T-cell receptor (TCR). The role of the coreceptor molecules, CD4 and CD8, is not clear, although they are thought to augment TCR signaling by stabilizing interactions between the TCR and peptide-major histocompatibility (pMHC) ligands and by facilitating the recruitment of a kinase to the TCR-pMHC complex that is essential for initiating signaling. Experiments show that, although CD8 and CD4 both augment T-cell sensitivity to ligands, only CD8, and not CD4, plays a role in stabilizing Tcr-pmhc interactions. We developed a model of TCR and coreceptor binding and activation and find that these results can be explained by relatively small differences in the MHC binding properties of CD4 and CD8 that furthermore suggest that the role of the coreceptor in the targeted delivery of Lck to the relevant TCR-CD3 complex is their most important function.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte ActivationMajor Histocompatibility ComplexAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsCD4 AntigensCD8 AntigensHumansLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)Protein TransportReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesCD4 AntigensCD8 AntigensLymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56(lck)Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID20837541
PMCPMC2947881
OpenAlexW2059422010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.