Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20837533›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors.

Peter Van Loo, Silje H Nordgard, Ole Christian Lingjærde, Hege G Russnes, Inga H Rye, Wei Sun, Victor J Weigman, Peter Marynen, Anders Zetterberg, Bjørn Naume and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 801 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
801citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

801 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,309 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Genomic and Epigenomic ctDNA Profiling in Liquid Biopsies from Heavily Pretreated Patients with DNA Damage Response-Deficient Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. RNASEH2B loss and PARP inhibition in advanced prostate cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. FFPE-CUTAC: A Single Assay, Multiple Layers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [The problem of determining tumor cell content].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

741 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter Van LooDepartment of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Clinic for Cancer and Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, N-0310 Oslo, Norway.
Silje H Nordgard
Ole Christian Lingjærde
Hege G Russnes
Inga H Rye
Wei Sun
Victor J Weigman
Peter Marynen
Anders Zetterberg
Bjørn Naume
Charles M Perou
Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Vessela N Kristensen
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Oslo · NOKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS P50-CA58223-09A1NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an allele-specific copy number analysis of the in vivo breast cancer genome. We describe a unique bioinformatics approach, ASCAT (allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors), to accurately dissect the allele-specific copy number of solid tumors, simultaneously estimating and adjusting for both tumor ploidy and nonaberrant cell admixture. This allows calculation of "ASCAT profiles" (genome-wide allele-specific copy-number profiles) from which gains, losses, copy number-neutral events, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) can accurately be determined. In an early-stage breast carcinoma series, we observe aneuploidy (>2.7n) in 45% of the cases and an average nonaberrant cell admixture of 49%. By aggregation of ASCAT profiles across our series, we obtain genomic frequency distributions of gains and losses, as well as genome-wide views of LOH and copy number-neutral events in breast cancer. In addition, the ASCAT profiles reveal differences in aberrant tumor cell fraction, ploidy, gains, losses, LOH, and copy number-neutral events between the five previously identified molecular breast cancer subtypes. Basal-like breast carcinomas have a significantly higher frequency of LOH compared with other subtypes, and their ASCAT profiles show large-scale loss of genomic material during tumor development, followed by a whole-genome duplication, resulting in near-triploid genomes. Finally, from the ASCAT profiles, we construct a genome-wide map of allelic skewness in breast cancer, indicating loci where one allele is preferentially lost, whereas the other allele is preferentially gained. We hypothesize that these alternative alleles have a different influence on breast carcinoma development.

Indexed as

Gene DosageGenes, NeoplasmGenome, HumanAllelesBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaFemaleHumansPloidies

Identifiers

PMID20837533
PMCPMC2947907
OpenAlexW2006288875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.