Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20837060›Full record

ReviewBrain research reviews2011

Prefrontal cortex and drug abuse vulnerability: translation to prevention and treatment interventions.

Jennifer L Perry, Jane E Joseph, Yang Jiang, Rick S Zimmerman, Thomas H Kelly, Mahesh Darna, Peter Huettl, Linda P Dwoskin, Michael T Bardo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neural Underpinnings of Social Stress in Substance Use Disorders.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Administration of an extrasynaptic δ-subunit GABAJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Practical, Economic, and Policy Implications of the Leve et al. Paper.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jennifer L PerryCenter for Drug Abuse Research Translation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0509, USA.
Jane E Joseph
Yang Jiang
Rick S Zimmerman
Thomas H Kelly
Mahesh Darna
Peter Huettl
Linda P Dwoskin
Michael T Bardo

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
NOVELTY, DOPAMINE AND RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINER01DA012964 · NIDA · YAUPON THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 2000 to 2013
$3.7M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE BEHAVIORT32DA007304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 1998 to 2012
$3.1M
Exploring the neurobiological response to anti-drug media messages with fMRIR21DA024401 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI JOSEPH, JANE E · 2009 to 2010
$736k
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA05312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012964NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA024401NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulnerability to drug abuse is related to both reward seeking and impulsivity, two constructs thought to have a biological basis in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). This review addresses similarities and differences in neuroanatomy, neurochemistry and behavior associated with PFC function in rodents and humans. Emphasis is placed on monoamine and amino acid neurotransmitter systems located in anatomically distinct subregions: medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC); lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC); anterior cingulate cortex (ACC); and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). While there are complex interconnections and overlapping functions among these regions, each is thought to be involved in various functions related to health-related risk behaviors and drug abuse vulnerability. Among the various functions implicated, evidence suggests that mPFC is involved in reward processing, attention and drug reinstatement; lPFC is involved in decision-making, behavioral inhibition and attentional gating; ACC is involved in attention, emotional processing and self-monitoring; and OFC is involved in behavioral inhibition, signaling of expected outcomes and reward/punishment sensitivity. Individual differences (e.g., age and sex) influence functioning of these regions, which, in turn, impacts drug abuse vulnerability. Implications for the development of drug abuse prevention and treatment strategies aimed at engaging PFC inhibitory processes that may reduce risk-related behaviors are discussed, including the design of effective public service announcements, cognitive exercises, physical activity, direct current stimulation, feedback control training and pharmacotherapies. A major challenge in drug abuse prevention and treatment rests with improving intervention strategies aimed at strengthening PFC inhibitory systems among at-risk individuals.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsExecutive FunctionExploratory BehaviorGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImpulsive BehaviorMotivationPrefrontal CortexRatsRisk FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID20837060
PMCPMC3005953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.