ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2011
Current strategies for myocardial gene delivery.
Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Achievements in Gene Therapy Strategies and Delivery Systems in Preclinical and Clinical Models of Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Gene Therapy for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Mechanisms, Modalities and Therapeutic Applications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in locally administered nucleic acid therapeutics.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- The calcium awakens: new insights in cardiac gene therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Current Landscape of Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Disorders.Current gene therapy · 2024Review
- Targeted Delivery for Cardiac Regeneration: Comparison of Intra-coronary Infusion and Intra-myocardial Injection in Porcine Hearts.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- AAV-mediated gene therapy: Advancing cardiovascular disease treatment.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Introducer Design Concepts for an Epicardial Parallel Wire Robot.Robotic surgery (Auckland) · 2021Article
- Analysis of recombinant adeno-associated viral vector shedding in sheep following intracoronary delivery.Gene therapy · 2019Article
- Nanoparticles administered intrapericardially enhance payload myocardial distribution and retention.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017Article
- Downregulation of the β1 adrenergic receptor in the myocardium results in insensitivity to metoprolol and reduces blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats.Molecular medicine reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Liquid jet delivery method featuring S100A1 gene therapy in the rodent model following acute myocardial infarction.Gene therapy · 2016Article
- Anti-inflammatory loaded poly-lactic glycolic acid nanoparticle formulations to enhance myocardial gene transfer: an in-vitro assessment of a drug/gene combination therapeutic approach for direct injection.Journal of translational medicine · 2014Article
- Surgical methods for cardiac gene transfer.Future cardiology · 2014Review
- Article
- Gene therapy delivery systems for enhancing viral and nonviral vectors for cardiac diseases: current concepts and future applications.Human gene therapy · 2013Review
- Gene transfer for congestive heart failure: update 2013.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2013Review
- Myocardial gene transfer: routes and devices for regulation of transgene expression by modulation of cellular permeability.Human gene therapy · 2013Review
- Comparison of adeno-associated virus serotypes and delivery methods for cardiac gene transfer.Human gene therapy methods · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing methods of cardiac gene delivery can be classified by the site of injection, interventional approach and type of cardiac circulation at the time of transfer. General criteria to assess the efficacy of a given delivery method include: global versus regional myocardial transduction, technical complexity and the pathophysiological effects associated with its use, delivery-related collateral expression and the delivery-associated inflammatory and immune response. Direct gene delivery (intramyocardial, endocardial, epicardial) may be useful for therapeutic angiogenesis and for focal arrhythmia therapy but with gene expression which is primarily limited to regions in close proximity to the injection site. An often unappreciated limitation of these techniques is that they are frequently associated with substantial systemic vector delivery. Percutaneous infusion of vector into the coronary arteries is minimally invasive and allows for transgene delivery to the whole myocardium. Unfortunately, efficiency of intracoronary delivery is highly variable and the short residence time of vector within the coronary circulation and significant collateral organ expression limit its clinical potential. Surgical techniques, including the incorporation of cardiopulmonary bypass with isolated cardiac recirculation, represent novel delivery strategies that may potentially overcome these limitations; yet, these techniques are complex with inherent morbidity that must be thoroughly evaluated before safe translation into clinical practice. Characteristics of the optimal technique for gene delivery include low morbidity, increased myocardial transcapillary gradient, extended vector residence time in the coronary circulation and exclusion of residual vector from the systemic circulation after delivery to minimize extracardiac expression and to mitigate a cellular immune response. This article is part of a Special Section entitled "Special Section: Cardiovascular Gene Therapy".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.