Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20837022›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2011

Current strategies for myocardial gene delivery.

Michael G Katz, JaBaris D Swain, Catherine E Tomasulo, Marina Sumaroka, Anthony Fargnoli, Charles R Bridges

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanoparticles administered intrapericardially enhance payload myocardial distribution and retention.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Advanced techniques in biology & medicine · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Gene transfer for congestive heart failure: update 2013.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2013
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael G KatzDepartment of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA .
JaBaris D Swain
Catherine E Tomasulo
Marina Sumaroka
Anthony Fargnoli
Charles R Bridges

Funding

Translational Studies in Heart Failure Gene TherapyR01HL083078 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRIDGES, CHARLES R · 2007 to 2018
$9.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1-R01-HL083078-01A2NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing methods of cardiac gene delivery can be classified by the site of injection, interventional approach and type of cardiac circulation at the time of transfer. General criteria to assess the efficacy of a given delivery method include: global versus regional myocardial transduction, technical complexity and the pathophysiological effects associated with its use, delivery-related collateral expression and the delivery-associated inflammatory and immune response. Direct gene delivery (intramyocardial, endocardial, epicardial) may be useful for therapeutic angiogenesis and for focal arrhythmia therapy but with gene expression which is primarily limited to regions in close proximity to the injection site. An often unappreciated limitation of these techniques is that they are frequently associated with substantial systemic vector delivery. Percutaneous infusion of vector into the coronary arteries is minimally invasive and allows for transgene delivery to the whole myocardium. Unfortunately, efficiency of intracoronary delivery is highly variable and the short residence time of vector within the coronary circulation and significant collateral organ expression limit its clinical potential. Surgical techniques, including the incorporation of cardiopulmonary bypass with isolated cardiac recirculation, represent novel delivery strategies that may potentially overcome these limitations; yet, these techniques are complex with inherent morbidity that must be thoroughly evaluated before safe translation into clinical practice. Characteristics of the optimal technique for gene delivery include low morbidity, increased myocardial transcapillary gradient, extended vector residence time in the coronary circulation and exclusion of residual vector from the systemic circulation after delivery to minimize extracardiac expression and to mitigate a cellular immune response. This article is part of a Special Section entitled "Special Section: Cardiovascular Gene Therapy".

Indexed as

AnimalsGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMyocardium

Identifiers

PMID20837022
PMCPMC3683651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.