ReviewNeuroinformatics2010
Data publishing and scientific journals: the future of the scientific paper in a world of shared data.
Review in Neuroinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Practical Guide to Reproducible Modeling for Biochemical Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Best Practices for Making Reproducible Biochemical Models.Cell systems · 2020Review
- From data sharing to data publishing [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations].MNI open research · 2019Article
- Processing and Analysis of Multichannel Extracellular Neuronal Signals: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
- Sharing Neuron Data: Carrots, Sticks, and Digital Records.PLoS biology · 2015Article
- Data persistence insurance.Neuroinformatics · 2014Article
- A simple tool for neuroimaging data sharing.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2014Article
- Measuring the value of research data: a citation analysis of oceanographic data sets.PloS one · 2014Article
- Making data sharing count: a publication-based solution.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20835853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.