Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20833816›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

A binary search approach to whole-genome data analysis.

Leonid Brodsky, Simon Kogan, Eshel Benjacob, Eviatar Nevo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. "Evolution Canyon," a potential microscale monitor of global warming across life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonid BrodskyInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. lbrodsky@research.haifa.ac.il
Simon Kogan
Eshel Benjacob
Eviatar Nevo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sequence analysis-oriented binary search-like algorithm was transformed to a sensitive and accurate analysis tool for processing whole-genome data. The advantage of the algorithm over previous methods is its ability to detect the margins of both short and long genome fragments, enriched by up-regulated signals, at equal accuracy. The score of an enriched genome fragment reflects the difference between the actual concentration of up-regulated signals in the fragment and the chromosome signal baseline. The "divide-and-conquer"-type algorithm detects a series of nonintersecting fragments of various lengths with locally optimal scores. The procedure is applied to detected fragments in a nested manner by recalculating the lower-than-baseline signals in the chromosome. The algorithm was applied to simulated whole-genome data, and its sensitivity/specificity were compared with those of several alternative algorithms. The algorithm was also tested with four biological tiling array datasets comprising Arabidopsis (i) expression and (ii) histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation CHIP-on-chip datasets; Saccharomyces cerevisiae (iii) spliced intron data and (iv) chromatin remodeling factor binding sites. The analyses' results demonstrate the power of the algorithm in identifying both the short up-regulated fragments (such as exons and transcription factor binding sites) and the long--even moderately up-regulated zones--at their precise genome margins. The algorithm generates an accurate whole-genome landscape that could be used for cross-comparison of signals across the same genome in evolutionary and general genomic studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArabidopsisChromosome MappingGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyIntronsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA SplicingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20833816
PMCPMC2947915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.