Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20833738›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2010

Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial.

Frédéric A Houssiau, David D'Cruz, Shirish Sangle, Philippe Remy, Carlos Vasconcelos, Radmila Petrovic, Christoph Fiehn, Enrique de Ramon Garrido, Inge-Magrethe Gilboe, Maria Tektonidou and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
31.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 489 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Frédéric A HoussiauRheumatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels 1200, Belgium. frederic.houssiau@uclouvain.be
David D'Cruz
Shirish Sangle
Philippe Remy
Carlos Vasconcelos
Radmila Petrovic
Christoph Fiehn
Enrique de Ramon Garrido
Inge-Magrethe Gilboe
Maria Tektonidou
Daniel Blockmans
Isabelle Ravelingien
Véronique le Guern
Geneviève Depresseux
Loïc Guillevin
Ricard Cervera
MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial Group
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Cochin · FRSt Thomas' Hospital · GBHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Santo António · PTHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GROnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BEOslo University Hospital · NOUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term immunosuppressive treatment does not efficiently prevent relapses of lupus nephritis (LN). This investigator-initiated randomised trial tested whether mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was superior to azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance treatment.

methodsA total of 105 patients with lupus with proliferative LN were included. All received three daily intravenous pulses of 750 mg methylprednisolone, followed by oral glucocorticoids and six fortnightly cyclophosphamide intravenous pulses of 500 mg. Based on randomisation performed at baseline, AZA (target dose: 2 mg/kg/day) or MMF (target dose: 2 g/day) was given at week 12. Analyses were by intent to treat. Time to renal flare was the primary end point. Mean (SD) follow-up of the intent-to-treat population was 48 (14) months.

resultsThe baseline clinical, biological and pathological characteristics of patients allocated to AZA or MMF did not differ. Renal flares were observed in 13 (25%) AZA-treated and 10 (19%) MMF-treated patients. Time to renal flare, to severe systemic flare, to benign flare and to renal remission did not statistically differ. Over a 3-year period, 24 h proteinuria, serum creatinine, serum albumin, serum C3, haemoglobin and global disease activity scores improved similarly in both groups. Doubling of serum creatinine occurred in four AZA-treated and three MMF-treated patients. Adverse events did not differ between the groups except for haematological cytopenias, which were statistically more frequent in the AZA group (p=0.03) but led only one patient to drop out.

conclusionsFewer renal flares were observed in patients receiving MMF but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Indexed as

AdultAzathioprineCyclophosphamideDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus NephritisMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidPrednisoloneSecondary PreventionTreatment OutcomeAzathioprineCyclophosphamideGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidPrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID20833738
PMCPMC3002764
OpenAlexW2149459259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.