ReviewInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2011
Advances in resuscitation strategies.
Review in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of hemodynamics and impedance using bioelectrical impedance analysis in hypovolemic shock-induced swine model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Thoracic, Peripheral, and Cerebral Volume, Circulatory and Pressure Responses To PEEP During Simulated Hemorrhage in a Pig Model: a Case Study.Journal of electrical bioimpedance · 2021Article
- Damage control resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Low-volume resuscitation with normal saline is associated with microvascular endothelial dysfunction after hemorrhage in rats, compared to colloids and balanced crystalloids.Critical care (London, England) · 2017Article
- TNF-α/IL-10 Ratio Correlates with Burn Severity and May Serve as a Risk Predictor of Increased Susceptibility to Infections.Frontiers in public health · 2016Article
- Disease-based modeling to predict fluid response in intensive care units.Methods of information in medicine · 2013Article
- Correlation coefficient between plethysmographic variability index and Systolic Pressure Variation as an indicator for fluid responsiveness in hypotensive patients in the ICU/OT.Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaArticle
- Pyruvate dose response studies targeting the vital signs following hemorrhagic shock.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Shock, regardless of etiology is characterized by decreased delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the tissues and our interventions are directed towards reversing the cellular ischemia and preventing its consequences. The treatment strategies that are most effective in achieving this goal obviously depend upon the different types of shock (hemorrhagic, septic, neurogenic and cardiogenic). This brief review focuses on the two leading etiologies of shock in the surgical patients: bleeding and sepsis, and addresses a number of new developments that have profoundly altered the treatment paradigms. The emphasis here is on new research that has dramatically altered our treatment strategies rather than the basic pathophysiology of shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.