Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20832171›Full record

ArticlePain2010

Pain behavior in the formalin test persists after ablation of the great majority of C-fiber nociceptors.

Shannon D Shields, Daniel J Cavanaugh, Hyosang Lee, David J Anderson, Allan I Basbaum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mechanism of Antinociceptive Effect of Vanillin in Formalin Test.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Alkamides inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nociceptor Neurons are Involved in the Host Response toJournal of inflammation research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Modality-Specific Modulation of Temperature Representations in the Spinal Cord after Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Two NewBiomedicines · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon D ShieldsDepts of Anatomy and Physiology and WM Keck Foundation Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Division of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Daniel J Cavanaugh
Hyosang Lee
David J Anderson
Allan I Basbaum
University of California, San Francisco · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Role of the Mrg family of GPCRs in nociceptionP01NS048499 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ANDERSON, DAVID J · 2005 to 2009
$5.5M
BRAINSTEM CONTROL OF PAIN TRANSMISSIONR01NS014627 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASBAUM, ALLAN I. · 1985 to 2016
$3.9M
Brainstem control of pain transmissionR37NS014627 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASBAUM, ALLAN I. · 2008 to 2014
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS NS14627NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS048499NINDS NIH HHS P01NS048499NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS014627NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS014627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the formalin test is a widely used model of persistent pain, the primary afferent fiber types that underlie the cellular and behavioral responses to formalin injection are largely unknown. Here we used a combined genetic and pharmacological approach to investigate the effect of ablating subsets of primary afferent nociceptors on formalin-induced nocifensive behaviors and spinal cord Fos protein expression. Intrathecal capsaicin-induced ablation of the central terminals of TRPV1+neurons greatly reduced the behavioral responses and Fos elicited by low-dose (0.5%) formalin. In contrast, genetic ablation of the MrgprD-expressing subset of non-peptidergic unmyelinated afferents, which constitute a largely non-overlapping population, altered neither the behavior nor the Fos induced by low-dose formalin. Remarkably, nocifensive behavior following high-dose (2%) formalin was unchanged in mice lacking either afferent population, or even in mice lacking both populations, which together make up the great majority of C-fiber nociceptors. Thus, at high doses, which are routinely used in the formalin test, formalin-induced "pain" behavior persists in the absence of the vast majority of C-fiber nociceptors, which points to a contribution of a large spectrum of afferents secondary to non-specific formalin-induced tissue and nerve damage.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaspasesDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFormaldehydeGene Expression RegulationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMustard PlantNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNociceptorsPainCaspasesFormaldehydeMrgprd protein, mousemustard oilPlant OilsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTRPV1 protein, mouseTRPV Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID20832171
PMCPMC2955806
OpenAlexW2004901620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.