Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20832019›Full record

ReviewSeminars in radiation oncology2010

Enhancing radiotherapy through a greater understanding of homologous recombination.

Christopher A Barker, Simon N Powell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in radiation oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regulation of recombination and genomic maintenance.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of IGF-1 receptor in radiation response.Translational oncology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher A BarkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Simon N Powell

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2 in Homologous RecombinationR01CA107640 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SIMON N. · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer can cause a wide range of cellular effects, the most biologically potent of which is the double-strand break in DNA. The process of repairing DNA double-strand breaks involves 1 of 2 major mechanisms: nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination. In this review, we review the molecular mechanisms of homologous recombination, in particular as it relates to the repair of DNA damage from ionizing radiation. We also present specific situations in which homologous recombination may be dysfunctional in human cancers and how this functional abnormality can be recognized. We also discuss the therapeutic opportunities that can be exploited based on deficiencies in homologous recombination at various steps in the DNA repair pathway. Side-by-side with these potential therapeutic opportunities, we review the contemporary clinical trials in which strategies to exploit these defects in homologous recombination can be enhanced by the use of radiotherapy in conjunction with biologically targeted agents. We conclude that the field of radiation oncology has only scratched the surface of a potentially highly efficacious therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

DNA RepairRecombination, GeneticCell CycleDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHumansNeoplasmsRadiation, IonizingRadiation OncologyRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation-Sensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID20832019
PMCPMC4972489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.